|
|
 E-mail this message to a friend
|
|
Title:
|
Pseudopartitives in Norwegian
|
|
Author:
|
Torodd Kinn
|
|
Email:
|
click here to access email
|
|
Homepage:
|
http://www.hf.uib.no/i/LiLi/SLF/ans/ToroddK/English.html
|
|
Degree Awarded:
|
University of Bergen
, Department of Linguistics and Comparative Literature
|
|
Degree Date:
|
2001
|
|
Linguistic Subfield(s):
|
Semantics
Syntax
|
|
Subject Language(s):
|
Norwegian, Nynorsk
Norwegian, Bokmål
|
|
Director(s):
|
Helge J. Dyvik
Kirsti Christensen
|
|
|
Abstract:
|
|
The dissertation investigates Norwegian pseudopartitive constructions like 'a cup of tea', 'three kilometres of road', and 'thousands of students'. A quantifying noun or denominal quantifier in <-vis> denotes a quantity, and a substance noun denotes something which has that quantity. The parts of the nominal may be juxtaposed or linked with either of the prepositions 'with' and 'of'.
Chapters 1 to 3 are an introduction and sketches of central theoretical notions and of Norwegian nominals. Chapter 4 is a detailed analysis of the Norwegian numeral system, with a focus on additive and multiplicative constructions. Chapter 5 contains a taxonomy of quantifying nouns and a section arguing for the recognition of a class of denominal quantifiers in <-vis>.
Chapter 6 discusses the first main question: What determines whether juxtaposition, 'with', or 'of' is used? Corpora of newspaper texts and novels provide a foundation for the discussion. It is argued that there is an iconic relation between presence and absence of a preposition. Absence (juxtaposition) corresponds to conceptual unity. Presence of a preposition corresponds to a higher degree of conceptual distance. The choice between 'with' and 'of' is shown to be based on competing metaphors of quantity: of accompaniment, containment, and material constitution, respectively.
Chapter 7 discusses the second main question: Which constituent is the head of the phrase -- the quantifying noun / quantifier in <-vis> or the substance noun? Many pseudopartitives are ambiguous, which is argued to depend on a choice of profile. There has partly been a diachronic development of reanalysis and grammaticalization, which implies a profile shift in the direction of the substance.
Chapter 8 concludes the dissertation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page Updated: 29-Nov-2009
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|
