* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
 
E-mail this message to a friend
Title: Projecting the Adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison
Author: Christopher Kennedy
Email: click here to access email
Homepage: http://www.ling.nwu.edu/~kennedy
Degree Awarded: University of California, Santa Cruz , Department of Linguistics
Degree Date: 1997
Linguistic Subfield(s): Semantics
Syntax
Director(s): Donka Farkas
Sandra Chung
William Ladusaw

Abstract:

This dissertation argues that gradable adjectives like bright, dense and short denote measure functions --- functions from objects to abstract representations of measurement, or scales and degrees. This proposal is shown to provide a foundation for principled explanations of a wide range of syntactic and semantic properties of gradable adjectives and the constructions in which they appear, ranging from the syntactic distribution of gradable adjectives to the scopal characteristics of comparatives and the empirical effects of adjectival polarity. Chapter 1 presents an overview of the core semantic properties of gradable adjectives and outlines the two primary approaches to their meaning that have appeared in the literature. Building on a number of empirical observations, the chapter reaches two conclusions: first, the meaning of gradable adjectives should be characterized in terms of scales and degrees, and second, two traditional assumptions --- the hypothesis that gradable adjectives denote relations between objects and degrees, and the analysis of complex degree constructions such as comparatives as expressions that quantify over degrees --- do not explain the scopal properties of comparatives. Chapter 2 presents the analysis of gradable adjectives as measure functions and argues that gradable adjectives combine with a degree morphology to generate properties of individuals, which are defined in terms of relations between two degrees. This analysis not only provides an explanation for the facts discussed in Chapter 1, but also supports a robust account of the compositional semantics of a range of degree constructions within a syntactic framework in which gradable adjectives project extended functional structure headed by degree morphology. Finally, Chapter 3 investigates the ontology of degrees and the characterization of adjectival polarity, focusing on the anomaly of comparatives constructed out of antonymous pairs of adjectives and the monotonicity properties of polar adjectives. The facts are shown to support an ontology in which degrees are formalized as intervals on a scale, or extents, and a structural distinction is made between two sorts of extents: positive extents and negative extents. This distinction forms the basis for a sortal characterization of adjectival polarity.
Add a dissertation
Update dissertation
Page Updated: 26-Nov-2009

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.