|
|
 E-mail this message to a friend
|
|
Title:
|
Semantic Operators in Different Dimensions
|
|
Author:
|
Tatjana Scheffler
|
|
Email:
|
click here to access email
|
|
Homepage:
|
http://www.dfki.de/~tasc/
|
|
Degree Awarded:
|
University of Pennsylvania
, Department of Linguistics
|
|
Degree Date:
|
2008
|
|
Linguistic Subfield(s):
|
Semantics
|
|
Subject Language(s):
|
English
German, Standard
|
|
Director(s):
|
Maribel Romero
|
|
|
Abstract:
|
|
This thesis studies the interface of truth-conditional and
non-truth-conditional meaning by investigating constructions whose meaning
and use differ because their semantic contributions are distributed
differently over the semantic dimensions. The constructions in question are
certain clausal adjuncts and complements.
For clausal adjuncts, I argue that two words for 'because' in German
('weil' and 'denn') contribute the same semantic operator (causality), but
on different semantic dimensions. While 'weil' operates in the assertion
(or at issue) dimension, 'denn' instead contributes a side comment (or
conventional implicature). Consequently, the two words differ both in their
range of use as well as in their semantic behavior as part of larger
sentences. I point out the same empirical dichotomy for other adjuncts such
as regular and relevance conditionals, 'although'-clauses, and different
kinds of adverbs. I show that for each of the constructions similar
semantic differences result because an operator is contributed on the at
issue dimension in one case, and as a conventional implicature in the other.
In the realm of complement clauses I investigate complements of attitude
verbs. Of the large range of constructions that express the semantic
arguments of attitude verbs, I study two in this thesis: slifting and
embedded verb-second clauses. I show that these two constructions again
mirror the situation as with 'weil' and 'denn' above: I propose that the
two constructions contribute the same semantic pieces, but distribute them
differently over the semantic dimensions of assertion and conventional
implicature.
In multiple case studies, this thesis thus addresses some of the most
important questions in linguistic semantics: What are the semantic pieces
associated with a certain word or construction? How are these semantic
pieces distributed over the known dimensions of meaning? And what effects
does the individual distribution of meaning parts over semantic dimensions
have for the overall meaning, function, and discourse effects of complex
utterances?
The issue of the dimensionality of semantic entailments is not bound to a
particular language (group), and the phenomena I study are generally
cross-linguistically well-attested. For practical reasons, though, the
discussion in this dissertation concentrates mostly on examples from German
and English.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page Updated: 25-Nov-2009
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|
