* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
 
E-mail this message to a friend
Title: A Bilingual Approach to the Examination of Writing Products and Processes in Adults Who Are Learning to Write in Their Second Language
Author: Sarah Dietrich
Email: click here to access email
Degree Awarded: Boston University , Literacy, Language, and Cultural Studies
Degree Date: 2001
Linguistic Subfield(s): Ling & Literature
Language Acquisition
Subject Language(s): English
Portuguese
Spanish
Director(s): Jeanne Paratore
Paul Abraham
Roselmina Indrisano

Abstract:

Through the examination of nine participants (Spanish and Portuguese-speakers) writing in L1 language and in English, I explored the following question: What do adult writers do when writing in L1 and L2? This study examined product-related features (text length, text structure, and text quality), process-related features (planning, drafting, revising, editing) in L1 and L2, as well as participants' beliefs about L2 writing, training, and the texts they produced. The study differed from earlier research in its use of multiple data sources (writing samples, think-alouds, observations, interviews) and in its bilingual approach to data gathering.

Analysis of the data gathered in this study led to several major findings. Text length in L2 varied with levels of L2 proficiency. Familiarity with task and writing context led participants with high levels of L2 proficiency to write more in English than they did in L1. However, neither L2 proficiency nor L1 text quality were found to be predictors of L2 text quality. Overall, participants planned very little, and drafting processes were found to vary across participants. Participants were less able to correct their errors and modified their texts more frequently in L2; in L2 they were more likely to engage in editing than in revising. Despite participants' efforts to modify their texts, final versions of both L1 and L2 essays contained errors of spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Finally, study participants reported feeling limited by their knowledge of L2 grammar and vocabulary, saying they felt unable to express their ideas fully in their second language.
Add a dissertation
Update dissertation
Page Updated: 24-Nov-2009

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.