* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
 
E-mail this message to a friend
Title: Antonyms in English and Modern Greek: A cognitive approach
Author: Pat Togia
Email: click here to access email
Degree Awarded: University of Manchester , Department of Linguistics
Degree Date: 1996
Linguistic Subfield(s): Semantics
Subject Language(s): English
Greek
Director(s): Alan Cruse

Abstract:

The present thesis is concerned, on the one hand, with a comparative analysis of the semantic properties and characteristics of antonym pairs such as, long/short, hot/cold, good/bad, and clean/dirty in English and Modern Greek and on the other, with the development of a cognitive model of antonymy based on the regularities observed in the behaviour of antonym pairs in the two languages. The former task can be described as language-specific, while the latter can be described as language-universal. The process, thus, underlying the present thesis is one that develops from language-specific facts and insights to general statements concerning a linguistic phenomenon.

An important problem in developing a cognitive model of antonymy is how to account for impartial and committed uses of members of antonym pairs. Cruse (1986, 1992) has formulated such a model for English antonym adjectives according to which impartiality can be adequately explained if three basic patterns are assumed to operate in the organization of the scale schemas underlying a pair of antonyms. These patterns are: The polar, the equipollent, and the overlapping patterns. The power of each of the above patterns of activating impartial readings of an antonym term are most clearly seen in the contexts of expressions of comparison, degree questions, and nominalizations.

The basis for the comparison of English and Modern Greek antonym pairs is provided by the work of Cruse (1976, 1980, 1986, 1992) on English antonym adjectives. Only the last of these works was expressly couched in cognitive terms, and it was this line of thinking I attempted to enlarge upon in the formation of a cognitive model of antonymy. The cognitive model of antonymy developed in the present thesis aims at showing that aspects of behaviour which previously presented themselves as extremely interesting but unexplained, are revealed as motivated by general cognitive principles.
Add a dissertation
Update dissertation
Page Updated: 28-Nov-2009

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.