* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
Donate
Links to LL pages: history, read, post, search and subscribe
Publishing Partner

CUP at LINGUIST
Journals

Publication Index Page

Books

Reviews

Dissertation Abstracts

Academic Papers

Style Sheet for Journals

Submit
-Books
-TOCs
-Dissertation Abstracts
-Academic Papers
Journals
Publishers
*
Related Links

Bibliographies

Dictionaries

Citing Online Sources

Join LINGUIST List

*
 
 
Browse Journal Calls


Snippets

Call Deadline: 30-Nov-2009

Call Information:
Issue 19 of the syntax/semantics minijournal 'Snippets' is now on line. The submission deadline for the next issue is November 30, 2009 As usual, submissions are to be sent to the address snippets@unimi.it. Some relevant excerpts from the Snippets editorial statement appear below. Further details can be found at the Snippets website (http://www.ledonline.it/snippets/) together with all published issues. Excerpts from the Snippets Editorial Statement: 1. Purpose The aim of Snippets is to publish specific remarks that motivate research or that make theoretical points germane to current work. The ideal contribution is the ideal footnote: a side remark that taken on its own is not worth lengthy development but that needs to be said. 2. Content We will publish notes that contribute to the study of syntax and semantics in generative grammar. The notes are to be brief, self-contained and explicit. They may do any of the following things: - point out an empirical phenomenon that goes against accepted generalizations or that shows that some aspect of a theory is problematic; - point out unnoticed minimal pairs that fall outside the scope of any existing theory; - point out an empirical phenomenon that confirms the predictions of a theory in an area where the theory has not been tested; - explicitly describe technical inconsistencies in a theory or in a set of frequently adopted assumptions; - explicitly describe unnoticed assumptions that underlie a theory or assumptions that a theory needs to be supplemented with in order to make desired predictions; - call attention to little-known or forgotten literature in which issues of immediate relevance are discussed. We also encourage submissions that connect psycholinguistic data to theoretical issues. A proposal for a pilot experiment in language acquisition or language processing could make for an excellent snippet. 3. Submission details We will accept electronic submissions at the address snippets@unimi.it. Electronic submissions may take the form of: (a) the text of an e-mail message, or (b) an attached file. The attached file should be a simple text file, a Word file (Mac or Windows), or a Rich Text Format (RTF) file. All submissions must state the name and affiliation of the author(s), and a (postal or electronic) return address. Submissions are to be a maximum of 500 words (including examples), with an additional half page allowed for diagrams, tables and references. Given that we envision the submissions themselves as footnotes, the submissions may not contain footnotes of their own. The ideal submission is one paragraph; a submission of five lines is perfectly acceptable. We will not consider abstracts. 4. Editorial policy Submissions will be reviewed by our editorial board, and review will be name-blind both ways. While we guarantee a response within 3 months of the submission deadline, we only guarantee a yes/no response to the submitter. We will not require revisions (barring exceptional cases). We allow resubmission (once) of the same piece.

Linguistic Field(s):
Semantics;Syntax


Back
Page Updated: 25-Nov-2009

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.