* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
Donate

Links to LL pages: history, read, post, search and subscribe

Publishing Partner

CUP at LINGUIST
Academic Papers

Publications Index Page

Books

Reviews

Journal TOCs

Dissertation Abstracts

Submit
-Books
-TOCs
-Dissertation Abstracts
-Academic Papers
Journals
Publishers
*
Related Links

Bibliographies

Dictionaries

Citing Online Sources

Join LINGUIST List

*
 
 

Academic Paper

Title: 'What do you want me to say?' On the Conversation Analysis approach to bilingual interaction
Author: Li Wei
Institution: University of London
Linguistic Subfield: Applied Linguistics; Discourse Analysis; Semantics
Abstract:

Is language simply a medium for the expression of intentions, motives, or interests, or is it also a site for uncovering the method through which ordered activity is generated? This question has wide-ranging implications for the study of bilingual interaction in particular, and for sociolinguistics generally. This article attempts to explicate the principles behind the Conversation Analysis (CA) approach to bilingual interaction. It addresses some of the criticisms that have been leveled against the CA approach, using both new data and new analyses of previously published examples. (Keywords: Conversation Analysis, bilingual interaction, code-switching).


CUP at LINGUIST

This article appears in Language in Society Vol. 31, Issue 2, which you can read on Cambridge's site.



Back
Add a new paper
Return to Academic Papers main page
Return to Directory of Linguists main page

Page Updated: 27-Nov-2009

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.