Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Wiley-Blackwell Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

The Vulgar Tongue: Green's History of Slang

By Jonathon Green

A comprehensive history of slang in the English speaking world by its leading lexicographer.


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

The Universal Structure of Categories: Towards a Formal Typology

By Martina Wiltschko

This book presents a new theory of grammatical categories - the Universal Spine Hypothesis - and reinforces generative notions of Universal Grammar while accommodating insights from linguistic typology.


New from Brill!

ad

Brill's MyBook Program

Do you have access to Dynamics of Morphological Productivity through your library? Then you can by the paperback for only €25 or $25! Find out more about Brill's MyBook program!


Academic Paper


Title: Some Primary Observations on /-Ta/ without N
Paper URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2019096
Author: Debaprasad Bandyopadhyay
Email: click here to access email
Homepage: https://independent.academia.edu/DebaprasadBandyopadhyay
Institution: Indian Statistical Institute
Linguistic Field: Semantics; Syntax
Subject Language: Bengali
Abstract: Primarily, author observed a problem with the bound morheme –Ta (classifier) in Bangla sentences like:/L//L/1. korchiSTa ki?/L/do-pr.cont-(-Honorific)-classifier what?/L/"What are you doing?"/L//L/2. korchoTa ki?/L/do-pr.cont-(+-Honorific) classifier what?/L//L/3. korchenTa ki?/L/do-pr.cont-(+Honorific) classifier what?/L//L/4. Hocche Ta Ki ?/L/happen-pr.cont- classifier what?/L/"What is happening?"/L//L/In all these cases, the bound morpheme (classifier) /-Ta/ is lonely as it is not a part of the preceding verbs which have already got inflections and thus are closed though following orthographical convention, /-Ta/ is written with those verbs. In all these cases, the wh-object (a noun) is missing as the speaker of these sentences does not have the cognition of that wh-object or otherwise s/he is cognizing the absence. The second possibility is that s/he may have the pragmatic competence of cognizing that wh-object but s/he is pretending to be ignorant of the same, i.e. s/he has a cognition of absence which is otherwise a presence. At the time of writing this paper, the author structurally interpreted this phenomenon from the perspective of Empty Category Principle.
Type: Individual Paper
Status: Completed
Publication Info: Indian Journal of Linguistics. Vol. 16. Jan-Dec 1989 (pp. 66-67)
URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2019096


Back
Add a new paper
Return to Academic Papers main page
Return to Directory of Linguists main page