Academic Paper |
|
|
|
|
| Title: | Is epenthesis a means to optimize feet? A reanalysis of the CLPF database |
| Author: | Helena Taelman |
| Institution: | University of Antwerp |
| Author: | Steven Gillis |
| Email: | click here to access email |
| Institution: | University of Antwerp |
| Linguistic Field: | Language Acquisition; Phonology |
| Subject Language: |
Dutch
|
| Abstract: | Fikkert (1994) analyzed a large corpus of Dutch children's early language production, and found that they often add targetless syllables to their words in order to create bisyllabic feet. In this note we point out a methodological problem with that analysis: in an important number of cases, epenthetic vowels occur at places where grammatical morphemes (e.g. plural and diminutive suffixes) may be expected. Hence, the seemingly targetless syllables may represent grammatical morphemes. A reanalysis of Fikkert's original data reveals that her rhythmic explanation cannot be maintained if those cases are excluded from the analysis. |
|
|
|
|
This article appears in Journal of Child Language Vol. 35, Issue 2, which you can read on Cambridge's site or on LINGUIST . |
|
|
|
|
Back
Add a new paper Return to Academic Papers main page Return to Directory of Linguists main page |
|


