Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Speaking American: A History of English in the United States

By Richard W. Bailey

"Takes a novel approach to the history of American English by focusing on hotbeds of linguistic activity throughout American history."


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Language, Literacy, and Technology

By Richard Kern

"In this book, Richard Kern explores how technology matters to language and the ways in which we use it. Kern reveals how material, social and individual resources interact in the design of textual meaning, and how that interaction plays out across contexts of communication, different situations of technological mediation, and different moments in time."


Academic Paper


Title: The Early Language in Victoria Study: Predicting vocabulary at age one and two years from gesture and object use
Author: Edith L. Bavin
Institution: La Trobe University
Author: M. Prior
Institution: University of Melbourne
Author: Sheena Reilly
Institution: Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital
Author: Lesley Bretherton
Institution: University of Melbourne
Author: J. Williams
Institution: Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital
Author: P. Eadie
Institution: The Royal Children's Hospital
Author: Y. Barrett
Institution: Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital
Author: O. C. Ukoumunne
Institution: University of Melbourne
Linguistic Field: Psycholinguistics
Abstract: The Macarthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDI) have been used widely to document early communicative development. The paper reports on a large community sample of 1,447 children recruited from low, middle and high socioeconomic (SES) areas across metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Regression analyses were conducted to determine the extent to which communicative behaviours reported at 0 ; 8 and 1 ; 0 predicted vocabulary development at 1 ; 0 and 2 ; 0. In support of previous findings with smaller, often less representative samples, gesture and object use at 1 ; 0 were better predictors of 2 ; 0 vocabulary than were gesture and object use at 0 ; 8. At 1 ; 0, children from the lower SES groups were reported to understand more words than children from the higher SES groups, but there were no SES differences for words produced at 1 ; 0 or 2 ; 0. The findings add to our understanding of the variability in the development of early communicative behaviours.

CUP AT LINGUIST

This article appears IN Journal of Child Language Vol. 35, Issue 3, which you can READ on Cambridge's site or on LINGUIST .



Add a new paper
Return to Academic Papers main page
Return to Directory of Linguists main page