Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

The Language Hoax

By John H. McWhorter

The Language Hoax "argues that that all humans process life the same way, regardless of their language."


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Language and Development in Africa

By H. Ekkehard Wolff

Language and Development in Africa "discusses the resourcefulness of languages, both local and global, in view of the ongoing transformation of African societies as much as for economic development.. "


The LINGUIST List is dedicated to providing information on language and language analysis, and to providing the discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in the digital world. LINGUIST is a free resource, run by linguistics students and faculty, and supported primarily by your donations. Please support LINGUIST List during the 2016 Fund Drive.

Academic Paper


Title: Locative terms and spatial frames of reference in Wan
Paper URL: http://www.reference-global.com/doi/abs/10.1515/JALL.2008.002
Author: Tatiana Nikitina
Email: click here TO access email
Homepage: http://www.projectwan.org/nikitina
Institution: Freie Universität Berlin
Linguistic Field: Typology
Subject Language: Wan
Abstract: The paper is a study of spatial expressions in Wan (Mande, Côte d'Ivoire). The system of locative postpositions of Wan comprises two semantic classes which have distinct historical sources: terms referring to intrinsic parts of inanimate objects, and body part terms. I discuss differences in the use and interpretation of locative terms from these two classes. Some of these differences can be explained by different degrees of grammaticalization, in that body part terms are to a lesser extent specialized for expression of abstract spatial relations than object part terms./L//L/I illustrate differences in interpretation between body part postpositions and object part postpositions by a pair of nearly synonymous postpositions tā 'on top of' and pēŋ 'at the head of', which rely in their interpretation on different frames of reference (fixed armatures vs. object-centered, Levinson 2003: 77–79). My analysis is based on the notion of internal asymmetry of the reference object, which allows the body part postpositions to pick out a spatial region in a way that is independent of the object's actual orientation. This example illustrates one way in which the internal asymmetry of the reference object constrains the interpretation of spatial adpositions.
Type: Individual Paper
Status: Completed
Publication Info: Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 29-1(2008): 29-47
URL: http://www.reference-global.com/doi/abs/10.1515/JALL.2008.002


Add a new paper
Return to Academic Papers main page
Return to Directory of Linguists main page