Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info

New from Oxford University Press!


It's Been Said Before

By Orin Hargraves

It's Been Said Before "examines why certain phrases become clichés and why they should be avoided -- or why they still have life left in them."

New from Cambridge University Press!


Sounds Fascinating

By J. C. Wells

How do you pronounce biopic, synod, and Breughel? - and why? Do our cake and archaic sound the same? Where does the stress go in stalagmite? What's odd about the word epergne? As a finale, the author writes a letter to his 16-year-old self.

Academic Paper

Title: Pragmatic Factors and Variation in the Expression of Spatial Goals: The case of into vs. in
Author: Tatiana Nikitina
Email: click here TO access email
Institution: Freie Universität Berlin
Linguistic Field: Semantics; Text/Corpus Linguistics; Typology
Abstract: Languages often allow for alternative ways of describing the same motion event. This paper investigates the use of into vs. directional in as alternative strategies for expressing spatial goals in English. Based on results of a corpus study, I discuss factors that favor the use of one or the other strategy. Firstly, in tends to be used only when the directional meaning can be inferred from some other element of the sentence. Secondly, the choice of a preposition is influenced by factors that are relevant for the pragmatic construal of a motion event, suggesting that pragmatic notions, such as the relative prominence of different subparts in the conceptualization of a complex event, may affect the morphosyntactic encoding of a locative argument.
Type: Individual Paper
Status: In Progress
Publication Info: Anna Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke, and Rick Nouwen (eds.) Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 175-95
Add a new paper
Return to Academic Papers main page
Return to Directory of Linguists main page