Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Wiley-Blackwell Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

The Social Origins of Language

By Daniel Dor

Presents a new theoretical framework for the origins of human language and sets key issues in language evolution in their wider context within biological and cultural evolution


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Preposition Placement in English: A Usage-Based Approach

By Thomas Hoffmann

This is the first study that empirically investigates preposition placement across all clause types. The study compares first-language (British English) and second-language (Kenyan English) data and will therefore appeal to readers interested in world Englishes. Over 100 authentic corpus examples are discussed in the text, which will appeal to those who want to see 'real data'


New from Brill!

ad

Free Access 4 You

Free access to several Brill linguistics journals, such as Journal of Jewish Languages, Language Dynamics and Change, and Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics.


Academic Paper


Title: Myths and the prehistory of grammars
Author: David W Lightfoot
Email: click here to access email
Institution: Georgetown University
Linguistic Field: Syntax
Abstract: Only a small number of the world's languages have any kind of recorded
history over more than a few generations, and in no case do records go back
more than a few thousand years. From some perspectives, this doesn't
matter. There are plenty of grammars to write and plenty of changes to
describe accurately and then to explain in these recorded histories.
Explanations for structural changes may be grounded in grammatical theory,
and careful examination of historical changes, where the goal is explanation
for how and why they happened, sometimes leads to innovations in
grammatical theory, illuminating the nature of grammatical categories or the
conditions for movement operations, for example. That has been the focus
of some work on language change and data from changes have been used to
argue for claims not only about grammatical theory but also about language
acquisition, that children learn only from simple structures (DEGREE-0
COMPLEX) and that acquisition is cue-based (Lightfoot 1991, 1999). That is
not to say, of course, that these propositions could not have been based on
other kinds of data, but the fact is that they were based on analyses of
historical change. From analyses of historical changes, we have learned
things about the nature of the language faculty and about how it develops in
children, unhampered by the limited inventory of changes.

CUP at LINGUIST

This article appears in Journal of Linguistics Vol. 38, Issue 1, which you can read on Cambridge's site .



Back
Add a new paper
Return to Academic Papers main page
Return to Directory of Linguists main page