Academic Paper |
|
|
|
|
| Title: | The Linguistic Affiliation Constraint and phoneme recognition in diglossic Arabic |
| Author: | Elinor Saiegh-Haddad |
| Institution: | Bar-Ilan University |
| Author: | Iris Levin |
| Institution: | Tel-Aviv University |
| Author: | Nareman Hende |
| Institution: | Tel-Aviv University |
| Author: | Margalit Ziv |
| Institution: | Tel-Aviv University |
| Linguistic Field: | Language Acquisition; Phonology; Psycholinguistics |
| Subject Language: |
Arabic, Standard
|
| Abstract: | This study tested the effect of the phoneme's linguistic affiliation (Standard Arabic versus Spoken Arabic) on phoneme recognition among five-year-old Arabic native speaking kindergarteners (N=60). Using a picture selection task of words beginning with the same phoneme, and through careful manipulation of the phonological properties of target phonemes and distractors, the study showed that children's recognition of Standard phonemes was poorer than that of Spoken phonemes. This finding was interpreted as indicating a deficiency in the phonological representations of Standard words. Next, the study tested two hypotheses regarding the specific consequences of under-specified phonological representations: phonological encoding versus phonological processing. These hypotheses were addressed through an analysis of the relative power of distractors. The findings revealed that children's difficulty in accessing Standard Arabic phonemes was due to a difficulty in the phonological encoding of Standard words. We discuss the implications of the findings for language and literacy development in diglossic Arabic. |
|
|
|
|
This article appears in Journal of Child Language Vol. 38, Issue 2, which you can read on Cambridge's site or on LINGUIST . |
|
|
|
|
Back
Add a new paper Return to Academic Papers main page Return to Directory of Linguists main page |
|
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
|
Report Broken Link
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents. |
|
