Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info

New from Oxford University Press!


It's Been Said Before

By Orin Hargraves

It's Been Said Before "examines why certain phrases become clichés and why they should be avoided -- or why they still have life left in them."

New from Cambridge University Press!


Sounds Fascinating

By J. C. Wells

How do you pronounce biopic, synod, and Breughel? - and why? Do our cake and archaic sound the same? Where does the stress go in stalagmite? What's odd about the word epergne? As a finale, the author writes a letter to his 16-year-old self.

Academic Paper

Title: Discourse Analysis of the Book 'Society Seen Through the Mirror of Life'
Paper URL:
Author: Debaprasad Bandyopadhyay
Email: click here TO access email
Institution: La Filológica por la Causa
Linguistic Field: Discourse Analysis; Ling & Literature; Philosophy of Language
Subject Language: Bengali
Abstract: This was a short discourse analysis of an autobiographical account of Niranjan Bhowmik, a ruthlessly marginalized man, who was categorized as 'insane'. The book was transcribed and edited by Amit Ranjan Basu (published by the Bibhasa (2004) and distributed by the Progressive Publishers, Kolkata.) The reviewer mentioned that this book was an exceptional publication as the editor, a professional Health Care Provider, (a) preserved the so-called (mis) spelling and non-well-formed non-standardized syntactic constructions of Bhowmik, thus Basu did not play the role of language managers/-polices/-judges and celebrated the joy of heterography; (b) did not categorize the 'disease' of Bhowmik following any 'norm'-al scale. The editor followed the Foucauldian path of anti-Cartesianism (thus he was nullifying Chomsky) in his Preface. The analyst maintained that this book would draw the attention of linguists, who were problematizing the boundary between “normal” well-formed language (Chomskian position) and 'abnormal' speaking/writing following Foucauldian path. The reviewer questioned, 'How do we know the differences between 'norm'-al way of speaking and 'ab'-normal way of speaking?' Cartesian Linguistics analyzed the algorithm of 'normal' 'well-formed' sentences only. This very construction of 'natural language' (e.g., the well-constructed written sentences) mercilessly marginalizes the language of so-called non-'natural' madness or folly. This question might be elaborated further by taking cue from Goutam Bhadra : how do we distinguish between error (khyati) and non-error (akhyati), when we are talking about normal and natural language? Well-formed syntagms were used as examples in the Chomskian syntactic analysis. There was no scope for discursive paradigmatic recurrences. That was sanity. This text, edited by Amit Ranjan Basu, might open a new avenue in linguistics.
Type: Individual Paper
Status: Completed
Publication Info: Amitranjan Basu, Sakar, Avik, ed., Anandabajar Patrika. 19 Feb 2005
Add a new paper
Return to Academic Papers main page
Return to Directory of Linguists main page