Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology

Edited by Jacques Durand, Ulrike Gut, and Gjert Kristoffersen

Offers the first detailed examination of corpus phonology and serves as a practical guide for researchers interested in compiling or using phonological corpora


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

The Languages of the Jews: A Sociolinguistic History

By Bernard Spolsky

A vivid commentary on Jewish survival and Jewish speech communities that will be enjoyed by the general reader, and is essential reading for students and researchers interested in the study of Middle Eastern languages, Jewish studies, and sociolinguistics.


New from Brill!

ad

Indo-European Linguistics

New Open Access journal on Indo-European Linguistics is now available!


Academic Paper


Title: Het gebruik van het Brugse dialoogpartikel dè (/dæ/)
Paper URL: http://www.neerlandistiek.nl/03.01/
Author: Bert Cappelle
Email: click here to access email
Homepage: http://stl.recherche.univ-lille3.fr/sitespersonnels/cappelle/
Institution: Université Lille - Nord de France
Linguistic Field: Language Documentation; Pragmatics
Subject Language: Dutch
Dutch
Dutch
Dutch
Abstract: This study exhaustively describes the usage of the dialogic particle dè in the Bruges dialect (as in Zie je do weeëre dè? 'Oh, here you are again!'). The text first presents a critical survey of previous traditional lexicographic descriptions and more formal linguistic attempts at analysing the interpretation of this discourse particle. It then provides a new, mainly corpus-based description of the placement, the syntactic distribution, the interpretation, and the constraints on the use of dè. The invariable semantic contribution of dè is rather scant: dè indicates that the speaker wants to react to something just said or to something perceptible in the speech situation. Though utterances with dè typically betray the speaker's heightened emotionality, it appears that a sense of surprise, which is usually claimed to be an inherent part of its semantics, is not always present. Moreover, it is not always the case that a wh-question with dè exempts the hearer from providing a specific value for the "X" represented by the wh-word. Knowing how to reply co-operatively to a wh-question with dè requires some amount of common sense reasoning on the part of the hearer. I argue for the necessity to describe dè with reference to the sentence types in which it can occur (e.g. yes/no-questions, statements, etc.). Although any given two types with dè share one or more properties, for each type there are special possibilities or restrictions that need stating explicitly.
Type: Individual Paper
Status: Completed
Publication Info: Neerlandistiek.nl 03(01)
URL: http://www.neerlandistiek.nl/03.01/


Back
Add a new paper
Return to Academic Papers main page
Return to Directory of Linguists main page