Featured Linguist!

Jost Gippert: Our Featured Linguist!

"Buenos dias", "buenas noches" -- this was the first words in a foreign language I heard in my life, as a three-year old boy growing up in developing post-war Western Germany, where the first gastarbeiters had arrived from Spain. Fascinated by the strange sounds, I tried to get to know some more languages, the only opportunity being TV courses of English and French -- there was no foreign language education for pre-teen school children in Germany yet in those days. Read more



Donate Now | Visit the Fund Drive Homepage

Amount Raised:

$34724

Still Needed:

$40276

Can anyone overtake Syntax in the Subfield Challenge ?

Grad School Challenge Leader: University of Washington


Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

What is English? And Why Should We Care?

By: Tim William Machan

To find some answers Tim Machan explores the language's present and past, and looks ahead to its futures among the one and a half billion people who speak it. His search is fascinating and important, for definitions of English have influenced education and law in many countries and helped shape the identities of those who live in them.


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Medical Writing in Early Modern English

Edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Paivi Pahta

This volume provides a new perspective on the evolution of the special language of medicine, based on the electronic corpus of Early Modern English Medical Texts, containing over two million words of medical writing from 1500 to 1700.


Academic Paper


Title: What the band didn't know: Semantic looping of slurs in a linguistic perspective
Author: Kim Ebensgaard Jensen
Email: click here to access email
Homepage: http://personprofil.aau.dk/118255?lang=en
Institution: Aalborg University
Linguistic Field: Cognitive Science; Lexicography; Pragmatics; Semantics; Sociolinguistics
Subject Language: English
Abstract: Taking its starting point in Andrew Jacob's (2002) theory of semantic looping, this paper is a discussion of the phenomenon of semantic looping of racist (and other) slurs as seen in the perspective of functional-cognitive linguistics. Semantic looping (also known as re-mixing, neorevisionism, and signifyin') is which is the appropriation and positive self-referential use of an otherwise derogative term by members of the group that the term was meant to oppress. The paper focuses in the self-referential use of 'nigga' by African Americans, but also discusses third wave feminists' self-referential use of 'grrl' as well as homosexuals' self-referential use of 'queer'. Semantic looping is first discussed in terms of its three subprocesses. These are agnomination (slight orthographic and/or phonological change), semantic reversion (semantic change into opposite meaning), and chiastic slaying (the erasure of the original oppressive content of the appropriated slur). Semantic looping is a valuable theory posed by communication scholars, but it ignores many linguistic and cognitive, which is a shame, given that semantic looping is largely a linguistic, or discursive, phenomenon. The remainder of the paper proceeds to discuss a number of concepts from cognitive linguistics that may be incorporated into the description of the linguistic and cognitive aspects of semantic looping, such as construal (social labels construe social identities), categorization (social labels express social categorizations in the form of, for instance, stereotypes), idealized cognitive models (the perception of social groups largely draws on idealizations of a number of factors), frames (derogative social labels draw on frames of perceived power relations among social groups), conceptual networks (the use of social labels may be said to activate patterns of concepts in and across conceptual networks), conceptual blending (the agnomination process involves blending at a formal level), entrenchment (the symbolic structures of social labels are likely to be entrenched in the speech communities in which they figure depending on frequency of use), and polysemy (looped slurs that do not involve agnomination may result in polysemous terms which have both derogatory and endearing senses depending on contexts of use). A model of the process of semantic looping is also posed, in which it is treated as a process of language change; the process is divided into three stages - namely, slurification (the development of the oppressive slur), looping (the appropriation and semantic reversal of the slur by its target group), and post-looping (the socio-cognitive aftermath of semantic looping).
Type: Individual Paper
Status: Completed
Publication Info: P E O (Pre-publications of the English Department of Odense University), 141 (2006): 1-66.


Back
Add a new paper
Return to Academic Papers main page
Return to Directory of Linguists main page