Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Holy Sh*t: A Brief History of Swearing

By Melissa Mohr

Holy Sh*t: A Brief History of Swearing "contains original research into the history of swearing, and is scrupulous in analyzing the claims of other scholars."


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

A New Manual of French Composition

By R. L. Graeme Ritchie

A New Manual of French Composition "provides a guide to French composition aimed at university students and the higher classes in schools. "


The LINGUIST List is dedicated to providing information on language and language analysis, and to providing the discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in the digital world. LINGUIST is a free resource, run by linguistics students and faculty, and supported primarily by your donations. Please support LINGUIST List during the 2016 Fund Drive.

Academic Paper


Title: Loudness Predicts Prominence: Fundamental Frequency Lends Little
Paper URL: http://kochanski.org/gpk/papers/2005/04pnp.pdf
Author: Greg Kochanski
Email: click here TO access email
Homepage: http://kochanski.org/gpk
Institution: Oxford University Phonetics Laboratory
Author: Esther Grabe
Homepage: http://www.phon.ox.ac.uk/~esther
Institution: University of Oxford
Author: John S. Coleman
Homepage: http://www.phon.ox.ac.uk/~jcoleman
Institution: University of Oxford
Linguistic Field: Computational Linguistics; Phonetics
Subject Language: English
Abstract: We built classifiers, trained the classifiers on human prominence/non-prominence judgements, and then evaluated how well they behaved. The classifiers operate on 452 ms windows centered on syllables, using different acoustic measures. By comparing the performance of classifiers based on different measures, we can learn how prominence is expressed in speech. Contrary to textbooks and common assumption, fundamental frequency (f0) played a minor role in distinguishing/L/prominent syllables from the rest of the utterance. Instead, speakers primarily marked prominence with patterns of loudness and duration. Two other acoustic measures that we examined also played a minor role, comparable to f0. All dialects and speaking styles studied here share a common definition of prominence./L/The result is robust to differences in labeling practice and the dialect of the labeler.
Type: Individual Paper
Status: In Progress
Publication Info: Accepted in J. Acoustical Soc. America
URL: http://kochanski.org/gpk/papers/2005/04pnp.pdf


Add a new paper
Return to Academic Papers main page
Return to Directory of Linguists main page