Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology

Edited by Jacques Durand, Ulrike Gut, and Gjert Kristoffersen

Offers the first detailed examination of corpus phonology and serves as a practical guide for researchers interested in compiling or using phonological corpora


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

The Languages of the Jews: A Sociolinguistic History

By Bernard Spolsky

A vivid commentary on Jewish survival and Jewish speech communities that will be enjoyed by the general reader, and is essential reading for students and researchers interested in the study of Middle Eastern languages, Jewish studies, and sociolinguistics.


New from Brill!

ad

Indo-European Linguistics

New Open Access journal on Indo-European Linguistics is now available!


Academic Paper


Title: Loudness Predicts Prominence: Fundamental Frequency Lends Little
Paper URL: http://kochanski.org/gpk/papers/2005/04pnp.pdf
Author: Greg Kochanski
Email: click here to access email
Homepage: http://kochanski.org/gpk
Institution: Oxford University Phonetics Laboratory
Author: Esther Grabe
Homepage: http://www.phon.ox.ac.uk/~esther
Institution: University of Oxford
Author: John S. Coleman
Homepage: http://www.phon.ox.ac.uk/~jcoleman
Institution: University of Oxford
Linguistic Field: Computational Linguistics; Phonetics
Subject Language: English
Abstract: We built classifiers, trained the classifiers on human prominence/non-prominence judgements, and then evaluated how well they behaved. The classifiers operate on 452 ms windows centered on syllables, using different acoustic measures. By comparing the performance of classifiers based on different measures, we can learn how prominence is expressed in speech. Contrary to textbooks and common assumption, fundamental frequency (f0) played a minor role in distinguishing
prominent syllables from the rest of the utterance. Instead, speakers primarily marked prominence with patterns of loudness and duration. Two other acoustic measures that we examined also played a minor role, comparable to f0. All dialects and speaking styles studied here share a common definition of prominence.
The result is robust to differences in labeling practice and the dialect of the labeler.
Type: Individual Paper
Status: In Progress
Publication Info: Accepted in J. Acoustical Soc. America
URL: http://kochanski.org/gpk/papers/2005/04pnp.pdf


Back
Add a new paper
Return to Academic Papers main page
Return to Directory of Linguists main page