Featured Linguist!

Jost Gippert: Our Featured Linguist!

"Buenos dias", "buenas noches" -- this was the first words in a foreign language I heard in my life, as a three-year old boy growing up in developing post-war Western Germany, where the first gastarbeiters had arrived from Spain. Fascinated by the strange sounds, I tried to get to know some more languages, the only opportunity being TV courses of English and French -- there was no foreign language education for pre-teen school children in Germany yet in those days. Read more

Donate Now | Visit the Fund Drive Homepage

Amount Raised:


Still Needed:


Can anyone overtake Syntax in the Subfield Challenge ?

Grad School Challenge Leader: University of Washington

Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info

New from Oxford University Press!


What is English? And Why Should We Care?

By: Tim William Machan

To find some answers Tim Machan explores the language's present and past, and looks ahead to its futures among the one and a half billion people who speak it. His search is fascinating and important, for definitions of English have influenced education and law in many countries and helped shape the identities of those who live in them.

New from Cambridge University Press!


Medical Writing in Early Modern English

Edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Paivi Pahta

This volume provides a new perspective on the evolution of the special language of medicine, based on the electronic corpus of Early Modern English Medical Texts, containing over two million words of medical writing from 1500 to 1700.

Email this page
E-mail this page

Review of  The Big Book of Concepts

Reviewer: Carrie A. Ankerstein
Book Title: The Big Book of Concepts
Book Author: Gregory L. Murphy
Publisher: MIT Press
Linguistic Field(s): Cognitive Science
Book Announcement: 14.986

Discuss this Review
Help on Posting

Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 17:11:55 +0100
From: C A Ankerstein <hcp02caa@sheffield.ac.uk>
Subject: The Big Book of Concepts

Murphy, Gregory L. (2002) The Big Book of Concepts, MIT Press, A Bradford book.

Carrie Ankerstein, Department of Human Communication Sciences, University of
Sheffield, England.


Gregory Murphy's "Big Book of Concepts" is organized around the issues that
surround the study of concepts, i.e. it is not organized around the various
theories of concepts. After the introductory first chapter, the theories of
concepts are discussed in chapters 2 and 3 and the following chapters describes
an issue or set of phenomena within concepts, these chapters end with a
discussion of how each theory of concepts would handle the issue.

The book is aimed towards an advanced undergraduate or beginning graduate
student audience. Murphy assumes that the reader has a general knowledge of
experimental psychology and some experience with cognitive psychology, though
knowledge about concepts is not assumed.

The chapters are self-contained and may therefore be read out of sequence.
Though this is the case, I think it may be useful to read some chapters before
others. For example, Murphy discusses "Knowledge Effects" and "Induction" in
separate chapters, though these issues come up again in later chapters. In
those later chapters, Murphy is careful to give adequate background in these
issues, however the reader may find it more fulfilling to have read these
chapters beforehand. Also, since many of the issues discussed in the book are
discussed with reference to the theories of concepts, it is advisable to at
least glance at the theories that Murphy discusses (see Chapters 2-4).


In the first chapter the "Introduction", Murphy outlines some fundamental
terminology: a "concept" is a mental representation of classes of things and
a "category" refers to the classes themselves. He also states the purpose of
his book: "[it] is not so much to tell you all about concepts as to provide
some kind of basis to your continuing acquisition of knowledge" (p. 8).

Chapter 2: Typicality and the Classical View of Categories
In this chapter, Murphy discusses the Classical or Definitional View of
concepts, which states: concepts are composed of necessary and sufficient
features. On this view, a concept is either an X or it isn't and all concepts
that are X are all on par with each other -- no member is better than the other.
It is these predictions, however that proved disastrous for the Classical View
as typicality effects were found and the mythical "necessary and sufficient"
features weren't.

Chapter 3: Theories
After the fall of the Classical View arose the Prototype View which states that
each category is represented by a single prototype or best example. Very
typical members of the category will share the most overlap of features with
the prototype and atypical members will share only a few features and may share
other features with another prototype of another category (e.g. tomato as a
fruit and/or vegetable). Thus the Prototype View solves many of the problems of
the Classical View: there are no defining features and typicality effects are
predicted. However, this view is not without problems either.

Another possibility is the Exemplar View: concepts are defined by personal
experience with that concept. For example, "dog" is the set of all dogs that
the reader of the word "dog" has encountered. The obvious argument against this
is that one does not run through all dogs one has seen, instead there is
a "general" idea of dogs.

The last view discussed is the Knowledge Approach which argues that concepts
are part of our general understanding of the world or our mental theories about
the world. This view is often called the Theory-Theory View.

Chapter 4: Exemplar Effects and Theories
The issue discussed in this chapter is that of generalization or knowing things
in general without thinking about a specific example. Murphy discusses two
different approaches to this view:

1. Exemplar Effects: when people encounter a new item, they use a
particular remembered exemplar to categorize the new item.
2. Exemplar Models: a formal (usually mathematical) approach to similarity

In this chapter, Murphy also returns to the "prototype or exemplar" question
that arose in the preceding chapter: are representations best examples or
generalized feature summaries. The question is not answered, but the discussion
is though provoking.

Chapter 5: Miscellaneous Learning Topics
The chapter is purposely named. In this chapter very specific issues are
discussed as well as broader issues that affect other phenomena discussed in
later chapters. These include: base-rate neglect in category learning, feature
correlations in concepts, category construction and category use and the
implications that follow.

By "base-rate" Murphy is referring to what may be considered a feature that
occurs most frequently in a given category, e.g. bird often fly but mammals
don't. In category learning, people will generally ignore the base-rate or
standard set of features and focus on more defining features, e.g. they won't
focus on the fact that birds often fly, but look for something more distinctive.

Feature correlation refers to the fact that an item is not a collection of
unrelated features, instead these often go together, e.g. birds have wings and
can fly, a knife has an edge and can cut. Categories are composed of clusters
of correlated features that differ from other categories that have different

Category construction refers to a commonly used methodology in which subjects
form new categories on their own without being told by the experimenter what
forms a category. By category use, Murphy is referring to the use of specific
exemplars or use of the category as a whole and how this use can alter the
categorization of concepts.

Chapter 6: Knowledge Effects
Many studies of concept learning use novel stimuli, e.g. things people have
never seen before like dot patterns or chimera, to explore the principles that
may be applied to other categories or domains. Though Murphy questions the
relevance of such findings -- they may not be applicable to real-life concept

In this chapter, Murphy discusses the type of effects found in more realistic
stimuli, more specifically, background knowledge and the use of this knowledge
in concept learning. By knowledge, Murphy means the post-hoc use of the general
world knowledge people have (right or wrong) and use to explain a category when
it is being learned. For example, upon learning that an ostrich is a bird, but
it doesn't fly, people may use their knowledge about birds, wings and flight to
rationalize a reason why ostriches don't fly: their wings are not strong/big
enough to lift the massive body. In the case of novel stimuli, people are
unable to use their knowledge about that category, because they have never
encountered it before.

Chapter 7: Taxonomic Organization and the Basic Level of Concepts
This chapter focuses on the hierarchical structure of concepts. A taxonomy
is "a sequence of progressively larger categories in which each category
includes all previous ones" (p. 199), e.g. animal-mammal-dog-bulldog. Murphy
discusses the phenomenon of the basic level or preferred level of
categorization, e.g. cat, dog, tool as opposed to Siamese cat, Labrador
retriever, and wrench. He addresses the following questions: Is there evidence
that people have basic levels? Do people use such hierarchies?

As Murphy acknowledges, this is rather murky water, but claims that there are
at least two generalizations that can be made about hierarchies:
1. People are able to learn and use taxonomic relations in order to draw
2. People are able to reason taxonomically about novel categories.

Chapter 8: Induction
If people were unable to make sensible inferences about new things, there were
be little advantage in knowing that something belongs to a specific category.
Categorization is not useful in and of itself, but it is being able to apply
category knowledge that is useful. Murphy discusses "induction" as "the kind of
reasoning that one uses when drawing conclusions about the category in general"
(p. 243). For example if you were asked to check up on your neighbor's dog, you
would from your knowledge of dogs know what to do, e.g. feed and water it, let
it out, etc.

The chapter discusses various research tasks that have investigated the kinds
of inductions that people make, how people use multiple categories when making
inductions about things there are uncertain how to categorize and the different
types of methodologies used in these experiments.

Chapter 9: Concepts in Infancy
Murphy argues that children's concepts are largely ignored in reviews of the
psychology of concepts and he offers two reasons why we should pay attention
to concept development:
1. Development speaks to one of the most central questions of cognitive
science: how knowledge comes into being.
2. Developmental evidence may place constraints on theories of adult
competence and performance.

Chapters 9 and 10 discuss these issues. Chapter 9 covers the development of
concepts from birth through the first year of life and Chapter 10 covers the
conceptual development of toddlers through the early school years.

In Chapter 9, Murphy discusses many studies, focusing not only on their
findings, but also the methods used. Categorization and natural and artificial
concept learning are also discussed.

Chapter 10: Conceptual Development
In this chapter, the fundamental question is: Are children's concepts radically
different to adult concepts? After showing that children perform similarly to
adult on many of the tasks generally used in the study of concepts, Murphy
discusses the developmental counterparts of the issues that surround adult
concepts: typicality, taxonomic organization and knowledge effects.

He concludes that though there are some differences in the content of
children's concepts and their performance on experimental tasks, there is no
radical difference between adult and child concepts.

Murphy also discusses other aspects of concept acquisition including
constraints on conceptual learning: syntactic constraints and fast mapping.
Syntactic constraints apply limits to the possible referents of new words, e.g.
Look at the quassle! In this case "quassle" can only refer to a thing rather
than an action. Fast mapping refers to the ability of children to use a word
after minimal exposure, e.g. 2 or 3 instances. Without such constraints,
concept learning would be an unbelievable achievement.

Chapter 11: Word Meaning
Murphy discusses the relationship between "words" and "concepts" though the
distinction has not been made in preceding chapters. In this chapter he
discusses the distinction. A "concept" is "a nonlinguistic psychological
representation of a class of entities in the world" and "word meaning" is "the
aspect of words that gives them significance and relates them to the world" (p.

Murphy's own claim is that "word meanings are psychologically represented by
mapping words onto conceptual structures" (388) and there are many
possibilities to how this might work, e.g. there may be a one-to-one mapping
where each word is mapped onto one concept. This is unlikely though, as soon as
one begins to think about polysemy -- the multiple senses of a word such as
theater can be used to refer to the institution which puts on plays or the
building in which plays are performed. Murphy offers a more complicated, though
satisfactory relationship based on three principles which take into account the
problem of ambiguity that arises out of polysemy.

Chapter 12: Conceptual Combination
This chapter addresses the fact that we rarely deal with concepts in isolation,
instead they general come in linguistic chains, e.g. "I found a really great
dog book yesterday" where "dog book" refers to a separate concept, combined by
the concept of "dog" and "book". The question is: How do people construct
complex concepts out of these parts? The chapter is mostly a presentation of
the various models that try to explain concept combination. He concludes with
the importance of the role that knowledge plays in the combination of concepts.

Chapter 13: Anti-Summary and Conclusions
Murphy concludes the book with issues that have not been discussed and why,
including: computational models of conceptual processes (e.g. categorization,
learning, induction), perception (the role of perceptual information in
categorization and judgments), similarity and cross-cultural issues. After
acknowledging these left-overs, he quickly sums up the theories discussed, the
messiness of the field and future directions in the study of concepts and
defends his organization and approach in the writing of the book, e.g. focusing
on the issues surrounding the study of concepts rather than the theories of


Murphy's book covers a lot of the more interesting issues surrounding concepts.
He adds some new insights into the field. The style is generally light, witty
and clear, though not always concise. His approach of organizing the book
according to issues and phenomena is novel and refreshing as most books on
concepts focus on theories without integration of issues and things that affect
them all.

There are, however a few things that have been surprisingly left out. For
instance, nowhere is there a discussion of the view that concepts may not be
featural representations, but instead atomistic representations (the Conceptual
Atomism View). All the theories and discussions in the book approach concepts
as featural representations, though there is an opposing view to this. Murphy
assumes a featural approach without pausing to defend it.

Though Murphy covers the development of concepts, claiming its importance to
the study of adult concepts, he neglects to mention the deterioration of
concepts as seen in semantic dementia. Though the issue of semantic breakdown
is complicated, e.g. is access to concepts or the conceptual store itself
damaged, it does offer some very interesting insight into the organization and
content of conceptual knowledge -- compatible with some views discussed in the
book and problematic for others.

ABOUT THE REVIEWER Carrie Ankerstein is a PhD student in the department of Human Communication Sciences at the University of Sheffield, England. She has a Masters in Applied Linguistics from the University of Cambridge, England and a Bachelor's degree in German Linguistics from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA / University of Freiburg, Germany. Her research interests include the organization and representation of concepts in semantic memory.

Amazon Store: