The study also highlights the constructs of current linguistic theory, arguing for distinctive features and the notion 'onset' and against some of the claims of Optimality Theory and Usage-based accounts.
The importance of Henk Zeevat's new monograph cannot be overstated. [...] I recommend it to anyone who combines interests in language, logic, and computation [...]. David Beaver, University of Texas at Austin
AUTHOR: Durkin, Philip TITLE: The Oxford Guide to Etymology PUBLISHER: Oxford University Press YEAR: 2009
Marc Pierce, Department of Germanic Studies, University of Texas at Austin
The study of etymology has enjoyed something of a resurgence in the last few decades. Old etymologies have been challenged; new etymological handbooks have appeared; and etymological studies have been taken in entirely new directions by some scholars. Examples of each of these phenomena, from the area of Germanic etymology, include the following: in the 1980s, new etymologies were proposed for words like 'book' and 'rune', both of which had well-established etymologies originally proposed by Jacob Grimm; recent scholarly handbooks include the scholarly (Liberman 2005, 2008), and the not-so-scholarly (Ostler 2008); and the etymological aspects of Theo Vennemann's theories about language in prehistoric Europe have led to some very interesting (and controversial) results (e.g., Vennemann 2003, along with Baldi and Page 2006). The volume under consideration here, written by the lead etymologist for the Oxford English Dictionary, fits neatly into this resurgence.
The book consists of nine thematic chapters, a brief concluding chapter, a detailed glossary, a commentary on recommended future readings, and an extensive list of references. Chapter 1, 'Introduction' (1-33), defines the term 'etymology' (as ''the investigation of word histories'' ), reviews some of the basic ideas behind etymology (sound change, linguistic borrowing, language families, etc) by looking at the etymologies of the English words 'friar' and 'sad', justifies the study of etymology (and also rebuts the 'etymological fallacy', which holds that a word's etymology somehow reflects its 'true' meaning), and then discusses some of the 'typical activities that characterize etymological research' (31), e.g. gathering data.
Chapter 2, 'What is a word? Which words need etymologies?' (34-60), first sketches various definitions of the term 'word', and then turns to processes like the creation of new words (via borrowing, compounding, etc). This is followed by a discussion of lexicalization, i.e. words that 'are opaque -- in meaning, or composition, or both' (49), e.g. English 'husband' and 'lord' (see Brinton and Traugott 2005, among other works, for more extensive discussion of lexicalization) and 'cranberry morphs' (words that look like compounds, but in which 'one of the elements is not analysable' ). The chapter closes with a consideration of what words actually need etymologies (words with transparent formations probably do not, for instance).
Chapter 3, 'Are words coherent entities' (61-93), concentrates on 'the variation in form and meaning shown by individual words' (61). This variation is first explicated by a discussion of English 'poke' in the sense 'bag, sack' (as in the idiom 'a pig in a poke', which, as Durkin notes, is the only context in which most speakers of English use this word); the next section considers the question of when a word's history actually begins. This issue is significantly more complicated than it might seem at first glance, due to factors like gaps in the historical record (e.g. Durkin notes that 'air kiss' is attested once in 1887, and then again from 1986 on ). Even in cases where etymologists might seem to be on steadier ground, like coinages, for instance, problems can arise (e.g. words can be in oral circulation for various lengths of time before being recorded). The chapter also covers topics like homonymy and polysemy (and how these relationships can change with time), merger in form and meaning (e.g. English 'melt' stems from two separate Old English verbs), splits in word form (e.g. English 'flour' and 'flower' stem from the same word), merger followed by split (as in the history of English 'council' and 'counsel', which merged in Middle English, and then split again later), and homonymic clash.
The first three chapters invoke topics having to do with word formation, without ever systematically treating the topic. Chapter 4, 'Word formation' (94-131), therefore offers such a systematic treatment. It first considers affixation and related issues (e.g. the borrowing of affixes and the emergence of new affixes), and then deals with synonyms, nonce formations, blocking, and compounding, along with processes like ablaut, clipping, and blending. The final section of the chapter deals with arbitrary and non-arbitrary linguistic signs, covering onomatopoeia, animal names, and expressive formations, among other phenomena.
Chapter 5, 'Lexical borrowing' (132-154), is the first of two chapters focused on borrowing. It lays out some of the basic concepts and terminology (e.g. loan words, loan translations, loan blends, etc), and also considers some possible motivations for borrowing (e.g. borrowing a word for a new thing), as well as patterns of borrowing in linguistic history (concentrating on Latin and French borrowings in English). Chapter 6, 'The mechanisms of borrowing' (155-178), continues the discussion of borrowing, discussing the issues of basic vocabulary, language shift, borrowings from multiple languages (as in cases like archaic English 'pease', yielding Modern English 'pea', which was originally borrowed into Old English from post-classical Latin, but also reflects French influence, as it contains a diphthong, not a monophthong like the Latin source), semantic influence, how to tell that borrowing has taken place, and lexical borrowings and code-switching.
Chapter 7, 'Change in word form' (179-221), largely deals with sound change, both regular (Grimm's Law, Verner's Law, the Great Vowel Shift) and sporadic (metathesis), as well as what Durkin calls 'associative change in word form' (197), e.g. analogy, folk etymology, spelling pronunciation, and metanalysis (as when 'a nadder' was reanalyzed as 'an adder'). It also touches on the question of 'how regular are regular sound changes?' (208), and concludes with a discussion of formal difficulties in etymologies. The discussion in the last section is based on etymologies like those for 'purse', where the initial [p] is unexpected; 'maple tree', which in Durkin's view is probably the 'result of analogy with 'apple tree'' (218); and 'polecat', which remains etymologically problematic, due largely to the 'multiplicity of form types which have not been satisfactorily reconciled with one another' (220).
Chapter 8, 'Semantic change' (222-265), covers change in meaning. Phenomena discussed in this chapter include types of semantic change (e.g. widening, narrowing, and pejoration), possible cases of semantic change motivated by influence from other words, and the predictability of semantic change. This last issue is particularly interesting, as some scholars, e.g. Sihler (2000), see semantic change as largely patternless, but others, like Traugott and Dasher (2002), argue that certain patterns can indeed be discerned. The discussion here is again based on various English etymologies, e.g. English 'nick' in the sense 'to make a notch or cut in (something', which closely resembles words in some other Germanic languages (e.g. Middle Dutch 'nicken', 'to bow, to bend' and Middle High German 'nicken', 'to bend, press down'), which suggests an etymological connection, but Durkin rejects this idea on the grounds that 'no convincing semantic connection can be made' between the English form and the other Germanic words (255). The final section of the chapter addresses the role of extralinguistic factors in etymology, cf. the Wörter und Sachen 'words and things' model of etymological research (e.g. Malkiel 1993).
The final thematic chapter of the book, 'Etymology and names' (266-283), deals with questions like names and non-linguistic history, names as etymons, and names as evidence for word meaning, among others. The 'Conclusion' (284-287) recaps some of the argumentation of the book.
This is a valuable and readable book. It offers a lucid, careful discussion of the main principles of etymology, and illustrates them with copious examples. It also nicely contextualizes etymology within the field of historical linguistics as a whole. I have already drawn on this book in preparing classroom lectures and discussions, and can easily envision building a course around this book.
There are some flaws, however. There are some odd gaps in the bibliography, as some important recent works (e.g. Liberman 2005, 2008) are not cited (and it should be noted that Liberman also has a blog on English etymology, available at http://blog.oup.com/category/reference/oxford_etymologist /). One could also of course quibble about the examples Durkin has chosen to illustrate his arguments; English 'key', for example, has a fascinating etymology that could have been included in the discussions of sound change or loan words, among other places in the work. (See Markey 1979, Liberman 1999-2000, Vennemann 2002, or Pierce forthcoming on this particular etymology.) Or consider the history of English 'jeep', which is most likely derived either from the abbreviation 'G.P.', standing either for 'General Production' or 'General Purpose' (although this issue itself is controversial), or from Eugene the Jeep, a character in the 'Popeye' comic strip, who squeaked 'Jeep!' There does not seem to be any conclusive evidence in favor of either proposal, showing just how problematic the issue can be (see Liberman 2005 for additional discussion of this example). There are also a handful of minor slips, e.g. Traugott and Dasher's work on semantic change originally appeared in 2002, not 2005. Such objections aside, this book deserves a place on every etymologist's shelves.
Baldi, Philip and B. Richard Page. 2006. Review article on Vennemann (2003). Lingua 116: 2183-2220.
Brinton, Laurel and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Liberman, Anatoly. 1999-2000. The etymology of the English word 'key'. Rivista Italiana di Linguistica e di Dialettologia I-II: 135-148.
Liberman, Anatoly. 2005. Word origins and how we know them. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Liberman, Anatoly. 2008. An analytic dictionary of English etymology: An introduction. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Malkiel, Yakov. 1993. Etymology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Markey, Thomas L. 1979. Nfr. kūch, Engl. 'key', and the unshifted consonant question. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik XLVI: 41-55.
Pierce, Marc. Forthcoming. Modern English 'key' and the problem of loan words in Germanic. To appear in Historische Sprachforschung.
Sihler, Andrew L. 2000. Language history: An introduction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vennemann, Theo. 2002. Key issues in English etymology. Sounds, words, texts, and change, ed. Teresa Fanego, Belén Méndez-Naya and Elena Seoane, 227-252. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Vennemann, Theo. 2003. Europa Vasconica - Europa Semitica. Edited by Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna. Berlin: de Gruyter.
ABOUT THE REVIEWER
ABOUT THE REVIEWER:
Marc Pierce is assistant professor of Germanic Studies at the University of
Texas at Austin. His research focuses largely on historical linguistics,
Germanic linguistics, the history of linguistics, and phonology.