Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology

Edited by Jacques Durand, Ulrike Gut, and Gjert Kristoffersen

Offers the first detailed examination of corpus phonology and serves as a practical guide for researchers interested in compiling or using phonological corpora


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

The Languages of the Jews: A Sociolinguistic History

By Bernard Spolsky

A vivid commentary on Jewish survival and Jewish speech communities that will be enjoyed by the general reader, and is essential reading for students and researchers interested in the study of Middle Eastern languages, Jewish studies, and sociolinguistics.


New from Brill!

ad

Indo-European Linguistics

New Open Access journal on Indo-European Linguistics is now available!


Query Details


Query Subject:   Czech sentence processing
Author:   Shravan Vasishth
Submitter Email:  click here to access email

Query:  
Sat, 22 Jan 2000 10:28:03 +0000 (GMT)
mwl1
mwl1@artemis.anglia.ac.uk
inversion in embedded clauses



I want to know if native speakers of English would accept relativisation
(or questioning) of a constituent of a sentence which contains a
stylistically marked subject-verb inversion.

For example, it is possible to say (1b) as a stylistically marked variant
of (1a):

(1a) My mother went into the garden.
(1b) Into the garden went my mother.

Do native speakers of English accept (2b) and (3b) as stylistically marked
variants of (2a) and (3a)? Or are (2b) and (3b) plainly ungrammatical?

(2a) I wonder into which garden my mother went.
(2b) I wonder into which garden went my mother.
(3a) That is the garden into which my mother went.
(3b) That is the garden into which went my mother.

Your judgment or suggestion of relevant literature (formal explanation,
corpus-based studies?) would be much appreciated. Thank you in anticipation!

Ming-Wei Lee
Anglia Polytechnic University, UK
LL Issue: 11.128
Date posted: 22-Jan-2000



Back

Sums main page