Query Details
| Query Subject: |
HELP: Conferences on numerals AND dictionaries of personal ideolects
|
|
| Author: | Victor Sonkin | |
| Submitter Email: | click here to access email | |
| Linguistic LingField(s): |
Language Documentation
|
|
| Query: |
I would be very much obliged if someone could provide me with any
information about forthcoming conferences on numeric words (any counting words, in fact) worldwide; and any information about dictionaries of individual ideolects of authors (e.g. ''Dictionary of Shakespeare's works''). Please respond to my address: victor@cityline.ru, since I am not on the list. Sorry if I blundered somewhere, I'm doing this at request of a colleague, while I am not a linguist in the strict sense of the word. Thanks a lot, Victor Sonkin, MA victor@cityline.ru I'm looking for languages in which some or all of the numbers 6-10 are compositions of 1+5, 2+5, etc. I would prefer cases where this is relatively transparent but I'll be more than happy to receive any data and/or references pertaining to such structures. Marc Picard Hello and Happy St. Patrick's Day! I am doing a study on the various methods of teaching English tenses as opposed to the traditional method. I am looking for any descriptions and/or lesson plans implementing the various methods (such as Alan Huffman's) and the success or failure of such methods. This would be any approach to teaching English tenses that alters the traditional 12 tenses: simple present, present progressive, simple past, past progressive, simple future, future progressive, present perfect, present perfect progressive, past perfect, past perfect progressive, future perfect and future perfect progressive. Thanks in advance, Tonya L. Creamer-Huey Old Dominion University Norfolk, VA x |
|
| LL Issue: | 8.392 | |
| Date posted: | 18-Mar-1997 | |
|
Back |
||
|
|
||
|
Sums main page
|
||
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
|
Report Broken Link
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents. |
|
