Featured Linguist!

Jost Gippert: Our Featured Linguist!

"Buenos dias", "buenas noches" -- this was the first words in a foreign language I heard in my life, as a three-year old boy growing up in developing post-war Western Germany, where the first gastarbeiters had arrived from Spain. Fascinated by the strange sounds, I tried to get to know some more languages, the only opportunity being TV courses of English and French -- there was no foreign language education for pre-teen school children in Germany yet in those days. Read more



Donate Now | Visit the Fund Drive Homepage

Amount Raised:

$34724

Still Needed:

$40276

Can anyone overtake Syntax in the Subfield Challenge ?

Grad School Challenge Leader: University of Washington


Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

What is English? And Why Should We Care?

By: Tim William Machan

To find some answers Tim Machan explores the language's present and past, and looks ahead to its futures among the one and a half billion people who speak it. His search is fascinating and important, for definitions of English have influenced education and law in many countries and helped shape the identities of those who live in them.


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Medical Writing in Early Modern English

Edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Paivi Pahta

This volume provides a new perspective on the evolution of the special language of medicine, based on the electronic corpus of Early Modern English Medical Texts, containing over two million words of medical writing from 1500 to 1700.


Query Details


Query Subject:   Testing for a Universal (`but', `also')
Author:   Arthur Merin
Submitter Email:  click here to access email

Linguistic LingField(s):  Typology
Translation

Query:   Mon, 7 Apr 1997 17:39:56 +0200 (MET DST)
Arthur Merin
arthur@IMS.Uni-Stuttgart.DE
Testing for a Universal (`but', `also')



REQUEST FOR PARTICIPATION IN TESTING FOR A LANGUAGE UNIVERSAL

The candidate, engaging a phenomenon parts of which Zellig
Harris noted as a syntactic fact of English, is:


Any language having bona fide translation equivalents
of the coordinating conjunction `but' will have
equivalents of

(1) `Kim walks but {Kim/(s)he[K]} talks' (Pa but Qa)

acceptable in suitable contexts (here, e.g.: we are
looking for a very silent messenger), whereas
equivalents of

(2) *`Kim walks but Sandy walks' (Pa but Pb)

will never be acceptable (assuming default prosody
or a suitable equivalent - see below), while in any
language having, in addition, a bona fide translation
equivalent of `also' or `too', equivalents of

(3) `Kim walks but Sandy {also walks/walks too}'

will always be acceptable again.


Explanatory Note: ''Default prosody'' for English means at the
very least: absence (or nonobligatoriness) of a marked pause
preceding `but'. I.e. the unacceptability judgment for
(2) is claimed to be stable for that single-speaker reading
(both with regard to prosody and interpretation) which is NOT
paraphraseable as

(4) `Kim walks, but then Sandy walks'

where `then' is NON-TEMPORAL, as evidenced by preservation of
its intended interpretation in

(5) `Kim has walked, but then Sandy has walked'.

(The intended and, for atemporal `then', presumably obligatory
reading for the English ex. (4) is one where the second clause
introduces an explanation for the eventuality designated by the
first.)


Native or born-again judgments are solicited on bona fide
translation equivalents of (1), (2) and (3); if possible
also on those of (4)/(5) and on the feasibility of a
(4)-style reading for (2)-equivalents. Most helpful would
be transliterations of exx. into Roman characters, if necessary
making use of ASCII diacritic conventions in use among students
of the language concerned, with a word-by-word English or
(e.g., where word order differs) quasi-English translation
underneath.

A summary of the results of the experiment will be posted,
along with a list of all those contributors who do
not express a preference for not being listed.
For participants or anyone else interested in the explanation
of the putative universal, a dense outline of the argument
(2 pages worth of PostScript or, on special demand,
typographically approximate ASCII) is available by e-mail on
request (repr. from the Abstracts of the 10th Int. Cong. Logic
Methodology & Philosophy of Sci., Florence 1995). A mathematical
background or access thereto is presupposed. An extensive version,
taking account, it is hoped, of the results of the experiment
proposed above, will be available in English soon. Participants
expressing an interest in being notified of its venue of
appearance will be kept informed.


Arthur Merin
Institute for Language and Computation (IMS)
University of Stuttgart
Azenbergstr. 12
70174 Stuttgart
Germany
LL Issue: 8.501
Date posted: 11-Apr-1997



Back

Sums main page