Featured Linguist!

Jost Gippert: Our Featured Linguist!

"Buenos dias", "buenas noches" -- this was the first words in a foreign language I heard in my life, as a three-year old boy growing up in developing post-war Western Germany, where the first gastarbeiters had arrived from Spain. Fascinated by the strange sounds, I tried to get to know some more languages, the only opportunity being TV courses of English and French -- there was no foreign language education for pre-teen school children in Germany yet in those days. Read more

Donate Now | Visit the Fund Drive Homepage

Amount Raised:


Still Needed:


Can anyone overtake Syntax in the Subfield Challenge ?

Grad School Challenge Leader: University of Washington

Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info

New from Oxford University Press!


What is English? And Why Should We Care?

By: Tim William Machan

To find some answers Tim Machan explores the language's present and past, and looks ahead to its futures among the one and a half billion people who speak it. His search is fascinating and important, for definitions of English have influenced education and law in many countries and helped shape the identities of those who live in them.

New from Cambridge University Press!


Medical Writing in Early Modern English

Edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Paivi Pahta

This volume provides a new perspective on the evolution of the special language of medicine, based on the electronic corpus of Early Modern English Medical Texts, containing over two million words of medical writing from 1500 to 1700.

Query Details

Query Subject:   Phoneme Inventory in Corpus for Speech Synthesis
Author:   Martin Tozer
Submitter Email:  click here to access email

Linguistic LingField(s):  Computational Linguistics
Text/Corpus Linguistics
Subject Language(s):  English

Query:   I am currently experimenting with a TTS system in General American and researching my dissertation on improving speech synthesis and TTS systems with phonological/phonetic knowledge. I have generated a series of phonological rules in order to more accurately label the the corpus by using alternatives in the segmentation. I am only dealing with within-word processes for the moment. The dictionary used to transcribe the corpus employs the symbols used in LPD notation (phonemic). It does not include the symbols of narrow phonetic transcription (allophones eg. aspirated voiceless stops, tap-flaps etc.).

In my rules i have integrated new symbolic symbols for tap-flaps and syllabic consonants. As I am considering including a rule related to aspirated voiceless stops, I am wondering if most English speech synthesis systems include these sounds as separate symbols in the transcription. That is, I wonder if most commercial systems differentiate between aspirated and non-aspirated voiceless stops at the transcription level.

The transcription is based on a modified version of the Festival Dictionary 0.4. As it is difficult to find any other freely available dictionaries for synthesis, I would greatly appreciate knowing what level of transcription they generally use or an inventory of symbols commonly used.

Please contact: tozer.martin@e-campus.uab.cat

Martin Tozer
LL Issue: 24.2137
Date posted: 21-May-2013


Sums main page