Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Wiley-Blackwell Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Language Planning as a Sociolinguistic Experiment

By: Ernst Jahr

Provides richly detailed insight into the uniqueness of the Norwegian language development. Marks the 200th anniversary of the birth of the Norwegian nation following centuries of Danish rule


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Acquiring Phonology: A Cross-Generational Case-Study

By Neil Smith

The study also highlights the constructs of current linguistic theory, arguing for distinctive features and the notion 'onset' and against some of the claims of Optimality Theory and Usage-based accounts.


New from Brill!

ad

Language Production and Interpretation: Linguistics meets Cognition

By Henk Zeevat

The importance of Henk Zeevat's new monograph cannot be overstated. [...] I recommend it to anyone who combines interests in language, logic, and computation [...]. David Beaver, University of Texas at Austin


Query Details


Query Subject:   Phoneme Inventory in Corpus for Speech Synthesis
Author:   Martin Tozer
Submitter Email:  click here to access email

Linguistic LingField(s):  Computational Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Text/Corpus Linguistics
Subject Language(s):  English


Query:   I am currently experimenting with a TTS system in General American and researching my dissertation on improving speech synthesis and TTS systems with phonological/phonetic knowledge. I have generated a series of phonological rules in order to more accurately label the the corpus by using alternatives in the segmentation. I am only dealing with within-word processes for the moment. The dictionary used to transcribe the corpus employs the symbols used in LPD notation (phonemic). It does not include the symbols of narrow phonetic transcription (allophones eg. aspirated voiceless stops, tap-flaps etc.).

In my rules i have integrated new symbolic symbols for tap-flaps and syllabic consonants. As I am considering including a rule related to aspirated voiceless stops, I am wondering if most English speech synthesis systems include these sounds as separate symbols in the transcription. That is, I wonder if most commercial systems differentiate between aspirated and non-aspirated voiceless stops at the transcription level.

The transcription is based on a modified version of the Festival Dictionary 0.4. As it is difficult to find any other freely available dictionaries for synthesis, I would greatly appreciate knowing what level of transcription they generally use or an inventory of symbols commonly used.

Please contact: tozer.martin@e-campus.uab.cat

Martin Tozer
LL Issue: 24.2137
Date posted: 21-May-2013



Back

Sums main page