Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info

New from Oxford University Press!


Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology

Edited by Jacques Durand, Ulrike Gut, and Gjert Kristoffersen

Offers the first detailed examination of corpus phonology and serves as a practical guide for researchers interested in compiling or using phonological corpora

New from Cambridge University Press!


The Languages of the Jews: A Sociolinguistic History

By Bernard Spolsky

A vivid commentary on Jewish survival and Jewish speech communities that will be enjoyed by the general reader, and is essential reading for students and researchers interested in the study of Middle Eastern languages, Jewish studies, and sociolinguistics.

New from Brill!


Indo-European Linguistics

New Open Access journal on Indo-European Linguistics is now available!

Query Details

Query Subject:   Phoneme Inventory in Corpus for Speech Synthesis
Author:   Martin Tozer
Submitter Email:  click here to access email

Linguistic LingField(s):  Computational Linguistics
Text/Corpus Linguistics
Subject Language(s):  English

Query:   I am currently experimenting with a TTS system in General American and researching my dissertation on improving speech synthesis and TTS systems with phonological/phonetic knowledge. I have generated a series of phonological rules in order to more accurately label the the corpus by using alternatives in the segmentation. I am only dealing with within-word processes for the moment. The dictionary used to transcribe the corpus employs the symbols used in LPD notation (phonemic). It does not include the symbols of narrow phonetic transcription (allophones eg. aspirated voiceless stops, tap-flaps etc.).

In my rules i have integrated new symbolic symbols for tap-flaps and syllabic consonants. As I am considering including a rule related to aspirated voiceless stops, I am wondering if most English speech synthesis systems include these sounds as separate symbols in the transcription. That is, I wonder if most commercial systems differentiate between aspirated and non-aspirated voiceless stops at the transcription level.

The transcription is based on a modified version of the Festival Dictionary 0.4. As it is difficult to find any other freely available dictionaries for synthesis, I would greatly appreciate knowing what level of transcription they generally use or an inventory of symbols commonly used.

Please contact:

Martin Tozer
LL Issue: 24.2137
Date posted: 21-May-2013


Sums main page