Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Wiley-Blackwell Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info

New from Oxford University Press!


Language Planning as a Sociolinguistic Experiment

By: Ernst Jahr

Provides richly detailed insight into the uniqueness of the Norwegian language development. Marks the 200th anniversary of the birth of the Norwegian nation following centuries of Danish rule

New from Cambridge University Press!


Acquiring Phonology: A Cross-Generational Case-Study

By Neil Smith

The study also highlights the constructs of current linguistic theory, arguing for distinctive features and the notion 'onset' and against some of the claims of Optimality Theory and Usage-based accounts.

New from Brill!


Language Production and Interpretation: Linguistics meets Cognition

By Henk Zeevat

The importance of Henk Zeevat's new monograph cannot be overstated. [...] I recommend it to anyone who combines interests in language, logic, and computation [...]. David Beaver, University of Texas at Austin

Query Details

Query Subject:   Qs: Textling. Confs, temporality in narr. texts
Author:   Miura Ikuo
Submitter Email:  click here to access email

Linguistic LingField(s):  Syntax
Subject Language(s):  English

Query:   Sat, 5 Sep 1998 13:39:08 +0900 (JST)
Miura Ikuo
Multiple wh-questions

Dear linguists,

I am going to write a peper about multiple wh-quesitons. So I would
like to know the grammatical status of some English multiple
wh-quesitons. In the literature, it is observed that while the
sentence in (1a) is grammatical, the corresponding (1b) is not.

(1) a. Who said what?

b. What did who say?

First, I want to know whether the following pairs of sentences exhibit
the same contrast as in (1).

(2) a. Whose mother bought what?

b. What did whose mother buy?

(3) a. People from where bought what?

b. What did people from where buy?

(4) a. Tell me whose advisor is where.

b. Tell me Where whose advisor is?

The sentences in (2a) and (3a) are from Stroik (1995), who says that
they are grammatical. But he doesn't mention about the grammaticality
of (2b) and (3b).

In the literature, psych-verbs like 'worry' and 'annoy' which take
the experiencer argument as the object behave differently from verbs
like 'say' with respect to some phenomena like anaphor binding. So I
want to know whether or not multiple wh-questions of psych-verbs like
(5) and (6) exhibit the same grammticality of (1).

(5) a. What worries who?

b. Who does what worry?

(6) a. What annoies who?

b, Who does what annoy?

If you can help, please reply to me personally. Thank you.

Ikuo Miura


Stroik, Thomas S. (1995) ''Some Remarks on Superiority Effects,'' Lingua
95, 239-258.
LL Issue: 9.1233
Date posted: 07-Sep-1998


Sums main page