Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology

Edited by Jacques Durand, Ulrike Gut, and Gjert Kristoffersen

Offers the first detailed examination of corpus phonology and serves as a practical guide for researchers interested in compiling or using phonological corpora


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

The Languages of the Jews: A Sociolinguistic History

By Bernard Spolsky

A vivid commentary on Jewish survival and Jewish speech communities that will be enjoyed by the general reader, and is essential reading for students and researchers interested in the study of Middle Eastern languages, Jewish studies, and sociolinguistics.


New from Brill!

ad

Indo-European Linguistics

New Open Access journal on Indo-European Linguistics is now available!


Query Details


Query Subject:   Syntax and semantics of "photograph"
Author:   Graeme Forbes
Submitter Email:  click here to access email

Linguistic LingField(s):  Syntax
Subject Language(s):  English


Query:   Mon, 9 Feb 1998 15:45:25 -0600
Graeme Forbes
forbes@mailhost.tcs.tulane.edu
Syntax and semantics of ''photograph''

Graeme Forbes
Celia Scott Weatherhead Distinguished Professor
Department of Philosophy
Tulane University
New Orleans, LA 70118-5698
Voice: 504-862 3385 (direct); 865-5305 (dept)
Fax: 504-862-8714

Syntax and semantics of ''photograph''

Can anyone explain why (1) below is acceptable, but (2) is not?

(1) I saw John leave.
(2) I photographed John leave.

According to Higginbotham, the ''unsupported clause'' in (1) is an event
nominal. At LF (1) is something like ''for some event e of John's leaving, I
saw e''. So why can't we say (2), since the same style of LF makes good
sense?
LL Issue: 9.200
Date posted: 10-Feb-1998



Back

Sums main page