Featured Linguist!

Jost Gippert: Our Featured Linguist!

"Buenos dias", "buenas noches" -- this was the first words in a foreign language I heard in my life, as a three-year old boy growing up in developing post-war Western Germany, where the first gastarbeiters had arrived from Spain. Fascinated by the strange sounds, I tried to get to know some more languages, the only opportunity being TV courses of English and French -- there was no foreign language education for pre-teen school children in Germany yet in those days. Read more

Donate Now | Visit the Fund Drive Homepage

Amount Raised:


Still Needed:


Can anyone overtake Syntax in the Subfield Challenge ?

Grad School Challenge Leader: University of Washington

Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info

New from Oxford University Press!


What is English? And Why Should We Care?

By: Tim William Machan

To find some answers Tim Machan explores the language's present and past, and looks ahead to its futures among the one and a half billion people who speak it. His search is fascinating and important, for definitions of English have influenced education and law in many countries and helped shape the identities of those who live in them.

New from Cambridge University Press!


Medical Writing in Early Modern English

Edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Paivi Pahta

This volume provides a new perspective on the evolution of the special language of medicine, based on the electronic corpus of Early Modern English Medical Texts, containing over two million words of medical writing from 1500 to 1700.

Query Details

Query Subject:   Persian data and EPP
Author:   Ahmad Lotfi
Submitter Email:  click here to access email

Linguistic LingField(s):  Syntax
Subject Language(s):  Persian, Iranian

Query:   Dear Linguists,

The Persian verb 'bayestan' (meaning 'to have to') is deficient in the
sense that contrary to other Persian verbs it cannot be inflected for
person. It may assume one of three morphologically isolated forms: (a)
'bayad' mainly used for present and future events (and even for past
ones if the verb to follow is already inflected for past tense), and
(b) 'bayest/bayesti' for past (but again not necessarily as they can
be used with other verbs inflected for present tense in order to refer
to a present/future tense event). Then when used in a phrase, it is
the verb to follow that must be inflected for person and tense
(although 'bayad' is not atemporal itself as mentioned above):

1. a. (Man) bayad beravam.
I must go-1st-sing-present.
''I must go''
b. (To) bayad beravi.
You must go-2nd-sing-present.
''You must go''
c. ...
2. a. (Man) bayad/bayest miraftam.
I must go-1sr-sing-past
'' I had to go''
b. (To) bayad/bayest mirafti.
You must go-2nd-ding-past
''You had to go''
c. ...

'Bayad' cannot be an auxiliary verb because Persian doesn't use
AUXs. Perhaps 'khastan' is the only verbial element that one may
consider as a future-tense auxiliary in Persian:

3. a. (Man) khaham raft.
I want-1st-sing.-future go-nonfinite
''I will go''
b. (To) khahi raft.
You want-2nd-sing.-future go
''You will go''
c. ...

Anyway, here it is 'khastan' that is inflected for tense and
agreement; the main verb (raft) remains non-finite. 'Bayad' cannot be
an auxiliary because it is the verb to follow and not 'bayad' itself
that is inflected for tense and agreement. Interestingly enough, in
Persian subjectless sentences like (4) below there's no inflection for
agreement and tense on the second verb either:

4. Bayad raft.
must go-nonfinite
roughly meaning ''To go is a must/ one must go''

'Bayad' is not inflected either. Perhaps it is just some temporal
feature of 'bayad' that makes it still a (present-time) sentence.
Although Persian is a prodrop language, one cannot assume that pro is
the subject of such sentences. Actually, the sentence is neutral with
regard to the subject, and whatever personal subject pronoun one
inserts in the subject position will make the sentence ungrammatical:

5. *a. Man bayad raft.
*b. To bayad raft.
*c. ...

The sentence will be still ungrammatical if a universal quantifier
occupies the subject position:

6. * Har kas bayad raft.
every one must go

The grammatical version of (6) is:

7. Har kas bayad beravad.
every one must go-3rd-sing-present

This seems to be a violation of the Extended Projection Principle
because it is grammatically necessary for the predicate 'bayad raft'
NOT to have a subject.

Does anyone know of similar phenomena in other languages? Please send
emails to my address below. If I gather sufficient data, I'll post a
summary. Any idea or comment is welcome.

Ahmad R. Lotfi, Ph. D.
English Dept.
Graduate School
Azad University at Khorasgan
Esfahan, IRAN.
MailTo: lotfi@www.dci.co.ir
- ----------------------------------------------------
LL Issue: 10.1655
Date posted: 01-Nov-1999


Sums main page