Query Details
| Query Subject: |
Historical roots of English Complementizers
|
|
| Author: | Neil Salmond | |
| Submitter Email: | click here to access email | |
| Linguistic LingField(s): |
Syntax
|
|
| Subject Language(s): |
English
|
|
| Query: |
Hi all,
In a lecture the other day, it was noted that many English Complementizers also perform other syntactic roles, eg 'that' as a pronoun, 'who' as an interogative. The lecturer left it hanging in the air, and it has therefore had the, I suppose, desired effect of whetting my curiosity big time. Are the links here lexically specific? Or was there some general rule in the past, that opened complementizer flood gates from other categories? All views welcome; summary forthcoming. - Neil |
|
| LL Issue: | 10.1801 | |
| Date posted: | 26-Nov-1999 | |
|
Back |
||
|
|
||
|
Sums main page
|
||
Business Plan,Business Ideas,Advanced Energy,High Technology,Healthy Diets,Healthy Foods,Games Guides,Games Cheats,Travel Guides,Travel Tips,Study Skills,Study Tips,Health Tips,Health Guides,Jewelry Stores,Jewellery UK Online,Digital Camera Reviews,Digital Camera Buying Guide,Replica Handbags,Replica Bags,Jackets on Sale,Jackets Clearance,WoW Gold,Cheap WoW Gold,Buy WoW Gold,WOW Gold,Swtor Credits


