Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology

Edited by Jacques Durand, Ulrike Gut, and Gjert Kristoffersen

Offers the first detailed examination of corpus phonology and serves as a practical guide for researchers interested in compiling or using phonological corpora


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

The Languages of the Jews: A Sociolinguistic History

By Bernard Spolsky

A vivid commentary on Jewish survival and Jewish speech communities that will be enjoyed by the general reader, and is essential reading for students and researchers interested in the study of Middle Eastern languages, Jewish studies, and sociolinguistics.


New from Brill!

ad

Indo-European Linguistics

New Open Access journal on Indo-European Linguistics is now available!


Query Details


Query Subject:   Assisted Causation in Marathi and Malayalam
Author:   Gavin Austin
Submitter Email:  click here to access email

Linguistic LingField(s):  Syntax
Subject Language(s):  Chamorro
Malayalam
Marathi
Nyanja


Query:   Dear all,

I recently posed a query about Hindi causatives (#19.1789, see below) and
received many helpful replies. It turned out that, when a causative is
formed on an ingestive verb (e.g. 'eat', 'drink') in Hindi, there is no
obligatory implication that the causee cannot perform the action without
assistance. (In Sinhala, there is.)

What I ought to have done at the same time was pose the same question about
Marathi, (1), and Malayalam, (2). (Both sentences are taken from Alsina &
Joshi 1991. I alone am to blame for the crude glossing.)

(1) sumaa-ni raam-laa paani paadzle
Suma-ERG Ram-ACC water drink-CAUS
'Suma made Ram drink water.'

Scenario A: Ram is incapable of carrying out the action by himself; e.g. he
is a very young child or an invalid.

Scenario B: Ram is capable of carrying out the action by himself; e.g. he
is an able-bodied adult.

My question is this: Is sentence (1) compatible with A only; B only; or
either A or B?

(2) amma kuttiye maanna tiittum
mother child-ACC mango eat-CAUS-FUT
'The mother will feed the child mango.'

Scenario A: The child is incapable of carrying out the action by himself.

Scenario B: The child is capable of carrying out the action by himself.

My question is this: Is sentence (2) compatible with A only; B only; or
either A or B?

I'd also like to pose the same question about causees formed on ingestive
verbs in Chichewa and Chamorro. It's highly unlikely that ingestive
causatives in either of these two languages behave any differently from
non-ingestive causatives, but I'd like to be certain if possible.

Thanks very much in advance for any input.

Best,

Gavin Austin
U of New England

Reference:

Alsina, A. and S. Joshi (1991) Parameters in causative constructions. In L.
M. Dobrin, L. Nichols and R. M. Rodriguez (eds.) Papers from the 27th
Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, IL: Chicago
Linguistic Society, pp. 1-15.

To refer to LINGUIST issue 19.1789:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/19/19-1789.html
LL Issue: 19.2102
Date posted: 01-Jul-2008



Back

Sums main page