Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology

Edited by Jacques Durand, Ulrike Gut, and Gjert Kristoffersen

Offers the first detailed examination of corpus phonology and serves as a practical guide for researchers interested in compiling or using phonological corpora


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

The Languages of the Jews: A Sociolinguistic History

By Bernard Spolsky

A vivid commentary on Jewish survival and Jewish speech communities that will be enjoyed by the general reader, and is essential reading for students and researchers interested in the study of Middle Eastern languages, Jewish studies, and sociolinguistics.


New from Brill!

ad

Indo-European Linguistics

New Open Access journal on Indo-European Linguistics is now available!


Query Details


Query Subject:   Polar interrogatives without auxiliaries
Author:   Bruno Estigarribia
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Subject Language(s):  English


Query:   Hello everyone,

I am currently working on acquisition of yes/no questions in English and I need to look at bibliography on questions in adult (or child) English, in particular acceptable polar interrogatives without auxiliaries (or without inversion), like these adult questions from CHILDES:

W/O aux:
“you watching me?”, “want your book Sarah?”, “you like apple ?” [from CHILDES/BROWN/Sarah006]

''that good ?'' (Int: is that good?)
''you want to eat it right there ?''
''gon (t)a have a bite ?''
''gon (t)a eat it ?''
''gon (t)a go see Jonathon today ?''
''gon (t)a eat the bread too ?''
''we gon (t)a go for a walk today ?''
[from CHILDES/Bates/snack28/amy]

W/O inv:
''you don't want any toast ?'' [from CHILDES/Bates/snack28/amy]

I am looking for bibliography explaining why these forms occur and what their function is. It seems to me a priori that there is no contrast between questions with auxiliaries and auxiliary-less ones, but I haven't performed any detailed analysis. So far, the conditions under which such ''reduced''
interrogatives are acceptable have eluded me, but I am sure a lot of people must have written about it.
On the contrary, questions with uninverted auxiliaries seem to contrast with the inverted ones. There is some sort of ''echoic'' feeling to them, or a metalinguistic or
commentary-like feeling sometimes. Mind you, this is just an impression.

Please reply directly to aananda@stanford.edu and I'll post a summary.
Thank you
LL Issue: 15.705
Date posted: 26-Feb-2004



Back

Sums main page