Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

The Structural Design of Language

By Thomas S. Stroik, Michael T. Putnam

In this book, Stroik and Putnam take on Turing's challenge. They argue that the narrow syntax – the lexicon, the Numeration, and the computational system – must reside, for reasons of conceptual necessity, within the performance systems.


Query Details


Query Subject:   Typology of multiple questions
Author:   Ralf Vogel
Submitter Email:  click here to access email

Query:   Dear co-linguists,

I'm interested in the typology of the syntax of questions
and would be very happy, if anybody could help me in
answering the following question:

The syntax of interrogative clauses varies in several ways
among languages. First, there are languages that have
wh-movement, like Engish, and languages that don't have it,
like Korean (for ease of reading, I'm only giving glosses):

1 a English: What did John eat _?
b Korean: John what ate?

Second, many languages can have multiple wh-elements within
one clause, but there are also some that cannot, Italian is
supposed to be such a language. However, Italian is a
wh-movement language. I haven't found yet information abou
*wh-in-situ languages that cannot form multiple questions*,
however:

2 a English: What did you do _ where?
b Italian: *What did you _ where?

3 a Korean: you what where did?
b ??????: *you what where did?

Does anybody know a language like 3b, i.e., a wh-in-situ
language that has no multiple questions? I would also be
very happy about hints to work dealing with this question. I
will post a summary of the answers to the list, if there are
any interesting results. Thanks in advance.



Dr. Ralf Vogel
mailto:rvogel@ling.uni-potsdam.de
Institute of Linguistics
University of Potsdam
http://ling.uni-potsdam.de/~rvogel


LL Issue: 12.1420
Date posted: 23-May-2001



Back

Sums main page