Featured Linguist!

Jost Gippert: Our Featured Linguist!

"Buenos dias", "buenas noches" -- this was the first words in a foreign language I heard in my life, as a three-year old boy growing up in developing post-war Western Germany, where the first gastarbeiters had arrived from Spain. Fascinated by the strange sounds, I tried to get to know some more languages, the only opportunity being TV courses of English and French -- there was no foreign language education for pre-teen school children in Germany yet in those days. Read more



Donate Now | Visit the Fund Drive Homepage

Amount Raised:

$34413

Still Needed:

$40587

Can anyone overtake Syntax in the Subfield Challenge ?

Grad School Challenge Leader: University of Washington


Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

What is English? And Why Should We Care?

By: Tim William Machan

To find some answers Tim Machan explores the language's present and past, and looks ahead to its futures among the one and a half billion people who speak it. His search is fascinating and important, for definitions of English have influenced education and law in many countries and helped shape the identities of those who live in them.


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Medical Writing in Early Modern English

Edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Paivi Pahta

This volume provides a new perspective on the evolution of the special language of medicine, based on the electronic corpus of Early Modern English Medical Texts, containing over two million words of medical writing from 1500 to 1700.


Query Details


Query Subject:   Negation in Contemporary French
Author:   Bruno Estigarribia Fioravanti
Submitter Email:  click here to access email

Query:   Hello everyone,

I'm currently writing a brief account of negation in
contemporary French and I'm having trouble finding articles and/or books
that aren't dated or that provide some original enlightenment. My claim
would be, basically, that we need to abandon the idea of "ne" dropping
to explain the different surface forms of negation. Instead, one could
contend, for instance, that the basic negation is a simple, postponed
one, and that one has to account for the appearance of "ne", not for its
"deletion".
It may lead nowhere, but perhaps it's an idea worth examining.
I'll summarize. Thanks to everyone.

Bruno Estigarribia Fioravanti
Universite Paris V-Rene Descartes-Sorbonne
Departement de Linguistique generale et appliquee
brunilda@online.fr



LL Issue: 12.1713
Date posted: 03-Jul-2001



Back

Sums main page