Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info

New from Oxford University Press!


Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology

Edited by Jacques Durand, Ulrike Gut, and Gjert Kristoffersen

Offers the first detailed examination of corpus phonology and serves as a practical guide for researchers interested in compiling or using phonological corpora

New from Cambridge University Press!


The Languages of the Jews: A Sociolinguistic History

By Bernard Spolsky

A vivid commentary on Jewish survival and Jewish speech communities that will be enjoyed by the general reader, and is essential reading for students and researchers interested in the study of Middle Eastern languages, Jewish studies, and sociolinguistics.

New from Brill!


Indo-European Linguistics

New Open Access journal on Indo-European Linguistics is now available!

Query Details

Query Subject:   Agreement with Animate Direct Objects in Dani
Author:   Giorgio Iemmolo
Submitter Email:  click here to access email

Linguistic LingField(s):  Historical Linguistics
Subject Language(s):  Dani, Western

Query:   Dear all,

I'm working on my dissertation on Differential Object Marking and
Differential Object Agreement, and I found a quite peculiar case of DOA
in a Trans New Guinea language, Dani.

Dani has a DOA system based on animacy: animate direct objects (as
well as indirect objects and beneficiaries) are signalled on the verb via
an affix. The intriguing fact about Dani is that, as many other Trans
New Guinea languages, it does allow the object prefixes to be directly
attached to the main verb only with a restricted subset of verbs, namely
(w)at- “hit, kill”, hei- “put”, and ha- “perceive”. With other verb roots,
direct object affixes must be attached to post-cliticised 'auxiliaries',
such as hei- “put”, -ha- “see”, -et- “give” or -ap- “do for” (the last two
are used to introduce recipients and beneficiaries) that are usually
compounded with the main verb stem, forming thus a sort of serial verb
construction (cf. Bromley 1981: 157 ff. in his Dani Grammar).

To my knowledge, this feature seems to be unique to Papuan
languages: while it seems to be likely that verb serialisation is the
source of these constructions (see Foley 1986), I don't know of any
other language in which the animate direct object is indexed on an
'auxiliary', nor do I know of any studies dealing with this rare pattern
from either a synchronic or a diachronic point of view. For instance, I
find it quite interesting that only the verbs “kill, perceive, put”, which
are quite heterogeneous from a semantic point of view, can freely host
the object affix.

I would be very grateful for any relevant suggestions or bibliographical
hints on this matter.

Thank you very much in advance,

Giorgio Iemmolo
LL Issue: 21.4889
Date posted: 04-Dec-2010


Sums main page