Query Details
| Query Subject: |
Grammatical Complexity
|
|
| Author: | Kaius Sinnemaki | |
| Submitter Email: | click here to access email | |
| Linguistic LingField(s): |
Morphology
Phonology Syntax Typology |
|
| Query: |
Dear colleagues,
I'm a graduate student at the University of Helsinki working on structural complexity and system economy of languages. It has long been claimed that structurally languages have equally ''rich'' / ''complicated'' / ''complex'' / ''economical'' grammars. My aim is to find results that would either verify or falsify the claim. For this purpose, I'm looking for correlations (or their absence) between the complexities of morphology, syntax and phonology. Some relevant correlations have been attested (e.g. Zipf 1968) that seem to support the claim. Yet, as far as I know, there's little relevant work available (e.g. Dahl 2004, McWhorter 2001 and the Commentary in Linguistic Typology 2001/5:2-3, Perkins 1992, Plank 1986). I would very much appreciate any help in finding the relevant literature (theoretical or empirical) and any results already available that have addresses this issue. You can respond directly to me (ksinnema@ling.helsinki.fi) and I'll post a summary and list of references, if there’s general interest. Thanks in advance, Kaius Sinnemäki Graduate student Department of General Linguistics University of Helsinki References: Dahl, Östen 2004. The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity. Amsterdam: Benjamins. McWhorter, John H. 2001. The World's Simplest Grammars are Creole Grammars. Linguistic Typology 5 (2-3): 125-156. Plank, Frans 1986. Paradigm Size, Morphological Typology, and Universal Economy. Folia Linguistica 20: 29-48. Perkins, Revere D. 1992. Deixis, Grammar, and Culture. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Zipf, George Kingsley 1968. The psycho-biology of language: an introduction to dynamic philology. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press. |
|
| LL Issue: | 15.3317 | |
| Date posted: | 27-Nov-2004 | |
|
Back |
||
|
|
||
|
Sums main page
|
||


