Query Details
| Query Subject: |
Written Discourse Completion Test
|
|
| Author: | Maryam Esmaeili | |
| Submitter Email: | click here to access email | |
| Linguistic LingField(s): |
Discourse Analysis
Pragmatics |
|
| Subject Language(s): |
English
|
|
| Query: |
Editor's Note: The URL in this submission may be broken onto 2 lines.
Please take care to ensure that you have copied and pasted the entire URL into your browser window. Hello, We are working on a topic regarding interlanguage pragmatics assessment for my thesis. My research question is "whether the Written Discourse Completion Test (WDCT) and the accompanying multidimensional scoring system constructed and developed in my study are valid and reliable to assess EFL learners' pragmatic competence to produce L2 speech acts of apology, request, and refusal?'' In fact, WDCT is a kind of test measuring one's pragmatic competence and is known in the pragmatics realm. This one is prepared by myself to see if it really measures one's pragmatic competence. For this purpose we need English native speakers as participants. Those who would like to participate, can find the questionnaire at an online survey. If you are willing to cooperate, please kindly see the link: http://www.kwiksurveys.com/online-survey.php? surveyID=NKEHOI_1117d6e All participants will remain anonymous and no personal information beyond 1.) age and 2.) gender will be collected. It won't take too much of your time, and it will provide us with priceless information crucial for the completion of our investigation. We will be infinitely grateful if you participate in this project by filling out this questionnaire and sending it to us as soon as possible. Thanks in advance. Best, Maryam Esmaeili MA, Shahrekord University Iran, Shahrekord |
|
| LL Issue: | 22.2135 | |
| Date posted: | 19-May-2011 | |
|
Back |
||
|
|
||
|
Sums main page
|
||
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
|
Report Broken Link
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents. |
|
