Query Details
| Query Subject: |
Semantic/Pragmatic Analyses of ''Understand''
|
|
| Author: | Eddy Gaytan | |
| Submitter Email: | click here to access email | |
| Linguistic LingField(s): |
Discourse Analysis
Pragmatics Semantics Syntax |
|
| Query: |
Dear Linguists,
I am researching the cognitive verb UNDERSTAND in English and other languages such as French. I am particularly interested in sentences in which understand takes the WH-word why, plus a clausal object complement like the following: 1. I understand why John V/Ved… 2. I do not understand why John V/Ved… I am interested in semantic/pragmatic/discourse-analysis analyses which explain the information not expressed and pointed to by why, which seems to be crucial for sentences like 1 and 2 to make sense. Or, rather, the cogitator in 1 and 2 is only being truthful if his use of why points to a set of reasons which allow him to understand a proposition. As I said before, I would appreciate any information regarding the verb understand of the WH-word why. |
|
| LL Issue: | 23.1110 | |
| Date posted: | 05-Mar-2012 | |
|
Back |
||
|
|
||
|
Sums main page
|
||
Business Plan,Business Ideas,Advanced Energy,High Technology,Healthy Diets,Healthy Foods,Games Guides,Games Cheats,Travel Guides,Travel Tips,Study Skills,Study Tips,Health Tips,Health Guides,Jewelry Stores,Jewellery UK Online,Digital Camera Reviews,Digital Camera Buying Guide,Replica Handbags,Replica Bags,Jackets on Sale,Jackets Clearance,WoW Gold,Cheap WoW Gold,Buy WoW Gold,WOW Gold,Swtor Credits


