Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology

Edited by Jacques Durand, Ulrike Gut, and Gjert Kristoffersen

Offers the first detailed examination of corpus phonology and serves as a practical guide for researchers interested in compiling or using phonological corpora


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

The Languages of the Jews: A Sociolinguistic History

By Bernard Spolsky

A vivid commentary on Jewish survival and Jewish speech communities that will be enjoyed by the general reader, and is essential reading for students and researchers interested in the study of Middle Eastern languages, Jewish studies, and sociolinguistics.


New from Brill!

ad

Indo-European Linguistics

New Open Access journal on Indo-European Linguistics is now available!


Query Details


Query Subject:   External Necessity, Epistemic/Deontic Possibility
Author:   Igor Yanovich
Submitter Email:  click here to access email

Linguistic LingField(s):  Historical Linguistics
Semantics
Syntax
Typology

Query:   The older works on grammaticalization of modality (Bybee et al. 1994,
van der Auwera and Plungian 1998) do not list a development of an
epistemic possibility sense from a circumstantial/deontic necessity
sense. Potentially, such a development occurred in some Dinka
dialects (such ambiguity is manifested in the speech of a speaker of
Dinka Bor I'm working with at the moment), and in Adyghe
(Kimmelmann 2010, field notes). I do not know much more at the
moment; even the direction of change is not supported by evidence,
though from the general considerations of how grammaticalization of
modal meanings works, I'd be surprised if the development went in the
other direction.

Here are two examples from Dinka Bor illustrating the phenomenon (I
omit tones and phonations):


Auxiliary ''dhil'', DEONTIC NECESSITY:

(1) Majok dhil riN thaal
Majok dhil meat cook
''Majok _must_ cook meat'' (can be used as a command)


Auxiliary ''dhil'', EPISTEMIC POSSIBILITY:

(2) a luel Dau, ye Majok a dhil riN thaal
AGR say Dau COMP? Majok AGR dhil meat cook
''Dau says that Majok _maybe_ is cooking meat''

Would anyone know of other languages which would have such
polysemy, or maybe even had a recorded history of such historical
change?
LL Issue: 23.1314
Date posted: 15-Mar-2012



Back

Sums main page