Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Wiley-Blackwell Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Language Planning as a Sociolinguistic Experiment

By: Ernst Jahr

Provides richly detailed insight into the uniqueness of the Norwegian language development. Marks the 200th anniversary of the birth of the Norwegian nation following centuries of Danish rule


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Acquiring Phonology: A Cross-Generational Case-Study

By Neil Smith

The study also highlights the constructs of current linguistic theory, arguing for distinctive features and the notion 'onset' and against some of the claims of Optimality Theory and Usage-based accounts.


New from Brill!

ad

Language Production and Interpretation: Linguistics meets Cognition

By Henk Zeevat

The importance of Henk Zeevat's new monograph cannot be overstated. [...] I recommend it to anyone who combines interests in language, logic, and computation [...]. David Beaver, University of Texas at Austin


Query Details


Query Subject:   Phonological Variation; Perception vs Production
Author:   Theodore Stern
Submitter Email:  click here to access email

Linguistic LingField(s):  Phonetics
Phonology

Query:   While there are general phonological theories that address how phonology might work from both perception and production standpoints (LIberman and Mattingly's Motor Theory of Perception; Steriade's P-Map; Boersma's Functional Phonology, inter alia). But these theories are general and due to the complexity of the situation, do not address variatioon.

We also know that as far as input is concerned, variation is the norm: we must extract phonological objects from various voice types, different accents, etc. And our individual phonetic output is also variant - the same individual will produce slightly different phonetic forms on different occasion; assumedly, these are outputs from the same underlying representation.

Thus, we have variation in the input, and variation in the output. But it seems that output variation is to a much lesser degree than input variation.

My query is thus: I am searching for relevant literature regarding the relationship between OUTPUT variability and INPUT variability. There is a large amount of literature that addresses each separately, but I am looking for phonological treatments or discussions which look at BOTH of these two different levels where variation occurs.
LL Issue: 23.4391
Date posted: 20-Oct-2012



Back

Sums main page