Featured Linguist!

Jost Gippert: Our Featured Linguist!

"Buenos dias", "buenas noches" -- this was the first words in a foreign language I heard in my life, as a three-year old boy growing up in developing post-war Western Germany, where the first gastarbeiters had arrived from Spain. Fascinated by the strange sounds, I tried to get to know some more languages, the only opportunity being TV courses of English and French -- there was no foreign language education for pre-teen school children in Germany yet in those days. Read more



Donate Now | Visit the Fund Drive Homepage

Amount Raised:

$34378

Still Needed:

$40622

Can anyone overtake Syntax in the Subfield Challenge ?

Grad School Challenge Leader: University of Washington


Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

What is English? And Why Should We Care?

By: Tim William Machan

To find some answers Tim Machan explores the language's present and past, and looks ahead to its futures among the one and a half billion people who speak it. His search is fascinating and important, for definitions of English have influenced education and law in many countries and helped shape the identities of those who live in them.


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Medical Writing in Early Modern English

Edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Paivi Pahta

This volume provides a new perspective on the evolution of the special language of medicine, based on the electronic corpus of Early Modern English Medical Texts, containing over two million words of medical writing from 1500 to 1700.


Query Details


Query Subject:   Syllabic Stress Violations
Author:   Mark Seidenberg
Submitter Email:  click here to access email

Linguistic LingField(s):  Phonology
Subject Language(s):  English


Query:   There is a familiar alternation in English such that a disyllabic word with weak-strong syllabic stress is a verb and the strong-weak pattern is a noun (e.g., PERMIT, CONSORT, ARRAY etc.). There are exceptions to this pattern, e.g., RELEASE for which both noun and verb are WS, and many others. My question is whether the standard pattern ever perfectly reverses: a word for which the WS form is the noun and the SW is the verb. I am not aware of any.

Although the query is about a narrow corner of English, there is some broader interest in the extent to which languages tolerate deviations from rules/central tendencies. If this kind of reversal does not occur in the above case, is it attested in other languages or components of language?

Apologies in advance if the question is a linguistically naive one covered in the first chapter of someone's textbook (though the reference would be appreciated nonetheless!).
LL Issue: 23.4965
Date posted: 28-Nov-2012



Back

Sums main page