Query Details
| Query Subject: |
Cancelling Gricean Implicatures
|
|
| Author: | Emma Borg | |
| Submitter Email: | click here to access email | |
| Linguistic LingField(s): |
Pragmatics
|
|
| Query: |
I read somewhere that Generalized Conversational Implicatures can be
cancelled by purely syntactic features; for instance, they are not present in downward entailing contexts. However, I don't know who discusses this point or where. If anyone could let me know who first raised this point, or where it has been subsequently discussed, I'd be very grateful. Emma Borg Philosophy Department University of Reading Reading RG6 6AA UK |
|
| LL Issue: | 16.2044 | |
| Date posted: | 30-Jun-2005 | |
|
Back |
||
|
|
||
|
Sums main page
|
||
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
|
Report Broken Link
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents. |
|
