Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info

New from Oxford University Press!


Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology

Edited by Jacques Durand, Ulrike Gut, and Gjert Kristoffersen

Offers the first detailed examination of corpus phonology and serves as a practical guide for researchers interested in compiling or using phonological corpora

New from Cambridge University Press!


The Languages of the Jews: A Sociolinguistic History

By Bernard Spolsky

A vivid commentary on Jewish survival and Jewish speech communities that will be enjoyed by the general reader, and is essential reading for students and researchers interested in the study of Middle Eastern languages, Jewish studies, and sociolinguistics.

New from Brill!


Indo-European Linguistics

New Open Access journal on Indo-European Linguistics is now available!

Query Details

Query Subject:   Acoustic Discreteness vs. Continuity in Production
Author:   Peyton Todd
Submitter Email:  click here to access email

Linguistic LingField(s):  Phonetics

Query:   Hello. I have two related questions:

1. No one doubts that phonemes are discrete. They are perceived
categorically, for example. But is it known whether their pronunciation is
discrete ACOUSTICALLY? That is, imagining an acoustic 'space' - I don't
know how many dimensions - maybe height of formant 1, height of formant 2,
amount of fricative noise, etc? - how much overlap is there? To keep it
simple, assume I'm asking about a single speaker:. I presume there is at
least some overlap, but is it substantial?

2. The above question was really to set the context for my main question,
which is about intonation. To many people, intonation at least seems to
vary continuously. I realize that there are theories (e.g. Pierrehumbert's)
which claim there are discrete tones (H, L, evidently M for some) and
discrete positions for them (H*, H-, H%, etc.) and further constellations
thereof ('surprise-redundancy', 'contrast-incredulity', etc.), but: do
their ACOUSTIC profiles 'clump' ( in the productions of a given speaker) to
the same extent as what I presume is found for segmental phonemes? Does it
do so at all?

References which show this?

Thanks for any help you can provide!

Peyton Todd
LL Issue: 16.3394
Date posted: 28-Nov-2005


Sums main page