Query Details
| Query Subject: |
Ambiguity and 'that' in (wh-) Questions
|
|
| Author: | John Winward | |
| Submitter Email: | click here to access email | |
| Linguistic LingField(s): |
Syntax
|
|
| Query: |
I'm doing research on the acquisition of wh- movement by Thai L1 speakers,
using truth value judgement tests on ambiguous question structures that can be disambiguated by using island effects, superiority etc. There's an issue here that looks really basic, but for which I can't seem to find any references in the literature: a. Why does John believe Mary is unhappy? b. Why does John believe that Mary is unhappy? To my ears at least, while a. is ambiguous between a matrix and embedded clause reading: 'because he saw her crying' vs. 'because she failed her exams', b. forces a matrix-clause reading: 'because he saw her crying'; *'because she failed her exams' (it doesn't seem to apply in relative clauses though). Is there a standard explanation, that I've somehow managed to miss? Sorry if this is a dumb question - I'm working a long way away from the mainstream out here... j |
|
| LL Issue: | 17.2296 | |
| Date posted: | 10-Aug-2006 | |
|
Back |
||
|
|
||
|
Sums main page
|
||


