Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Sorry About That

By Edwin L. Battistella

Sorry About That "explores why we apologize or don't and how our apologies succeed or fail."


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Language and Development in Africa

By H. Ekkehard Wolff

Language and Development in Africa "discusses the resourcefulness of languages, both local and global, in view of the ongoing transformation of African societies as much as for economic development.. "


The LINGUIST List is dedicated to providing information on language and language analysis, and to providing the discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in the digital world. LINGUIST is a free resource, run by linguistics students and faculty, and supported primarily by your donations. Please support LINGUIST List during the 2016 Fund Drive.

Summary Details


Query:   Inversion in embedded clauses
Author:  Ming-Wei Lee
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Syntax

Summary:   I ASKED WHETHER NATIVE SPEAKERS OF ENGLISH ACCEPT (2B) AND (3B) AS STYLISTICALLY MARKED VARIANTS OF (2A) AND (3A), OR WHETHER (2B) AND (3B) ARE PLAINLY UNGRAMMATICAL?

(2A) I WONDER INTO WHICH GARDEN MY MOTHER WENT.
(2B) I WONDER INTO WHICH GARDEN WENT MY MOTHER.
(3A) THAT IS THE GARDEN INTO WHICH MY MOTHER WENT.
(3B) THAT IS THE GARDEN INTO WHICH WENT MY MOTHER.

I RECEIVED 15 REPLIES. A FEW RESPONDENTS CAUTIONED THAT (IN AMERICAN ENGLISH) EVEN (2A) AND (2B) ARE STYLISTICALLY MARKED BECAUSE OF THE USE OF PIED PIPING. SOME OTHER RESPONDENTS MENTIONED A CONTRAST BETWEEN (2B) AND (3B), SO I THINK I HAD BETTER LIST WHAT EACH RESPONDENT/INFORMANT SAID ABOUT EACH SENTENCE IN THIS SUMMARY. (16 INFORMANTS' JUDGMENTS ARE LISTED HERE BECAUSE TWO REPLIES CONTAIN DATA FROM MORE THAN ONE INFORMANT
AND ONE CONTAINS NO JUDGMENT DATA.)

FOR (2B):
(1) 'SOUND FINE ... SEEM A LITTLE LESS STYLISTICALLY MARKED THAN THE NON-EXTRACTED CASE ... SOUND EVEN BETTER IF THE INVERTED SUBJECT IS HEAVY'
(2) 'UNGRAMMATICAL, OR AT LEAST VERY ODD'
(3) 'PLAINLY UNGRAMMATICAL'
(4) 'UNGRAMMATICAL ... ONE STEP BEYOND ''STYLISTICALLY ODD'''
(5) 'CANNOT ACCEPT'
(6) 'BORDERLLINE'
(7) 'ODD'
(8) 'FINE'
(9) 'IMPOSSIBLE'
(10) 'A STYLISTIC VARIANT'
(11) 'DISTINCTLY STRANGE TO ME, BUT NOT ABSOLUTELY UNGRAMMATICAL'
(12) 'I BELIEVE ALL OF THE TYPES YOU ARE LOOKING FOR ARE ATTESTED. HOWEVER, THE PRAGMATICS (OR DISCOURSE FUNCTION) OF THIS CONSTRUCTION MAKE A LOT OF EXAMPLES THAT ARE CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT ANY SALIENT CONTEXT SOUND PRETTY WEIRD'
(13) 'A LITTLE AWKWARD, PRETENTIOUS, PERHAPS ARCHAIC, AND PSEUDO-LITERARY ... NOT UNGRAMMATICAL' (14) 'COMPLETELY IMPOSSIBLE'
(15) 'RIGHT OUT'
(16) 'NOT ACCEPTABLE'

FOR (3B):
(1) SAME AS (2B)
(2) 'POSSIBLE, AS A MEANS OF EXPRESSING FOCUS'
(3) SAME AS (2B)
(4) SAME AS (2B)
(5) SAME AS (2B)
(6) 'NOT AT ALL ACCEPTABLE'
(7) 'FINE IF SOMEWHAT MARKED'
(8) 'STRANGE'
(9) 'OK IF YOU MAKE THE INVERTED SUBJECT HEAVY'
(10) 'AWKWARD AND STRAINED, THOUGH NOT UNGRAMMATICAL'
(11) SAME AS (2B)
(12) SAME AS (2B)
(13) SAME AS (2B)
(14) 'CONCEIVABLE (IF WE MAKE ''MY MOTHER'' A BIT HEAVIER), THOUGH IT SOUNDS LIKE FANCY LITERARY STYLE'
(15) 'MARGINALLY LESS BAD'
(16) SAME AS (2B)

MANY THANKS FOR THE REPLIES.

MING-WEI LEE
ANGLIA POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY, UK

LL Issue: 11.165
Date Posted: 26-Jan-2000
Original Query: Read original query