Featured Linguist!

Jost Gippert: Our Featured Linguist!

"Buenos dias", "buenas noches" -- this was the first words in a foreign language I heard in my life, as a three-year old boy growing up in developing post-war Western Germany, where the first gastarbeiters had arrived from Spain. Fascinated by the strange sounds, I tried to get to know some more languages, the only opportunity being TV courses of English and French -- there was no foreign language education for pre-teen school children in Germany yet in those days. Read more



Donate Now | Visit the Fund Drive Homepage

Amount Raised:

$34378

Still Needed:

$40622

Can anyone overtake Syntax in the Subfield Challenge ?

Grad School Challenge Leader: University of Washington


Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

What is English? And Why Should We Care?

By: Tim William Machan

To find some answers Tim Machan explores the language's present and past, and looks ahead to its futures among the one and a half billion people who speak it. His search is fascinating and important, for definitions of English have influenced education and law in many countries and helped shape the identities of those who live in them.


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Medical Writing in Early Modern English

Edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Paivi Pahta

This volume provides a new perspective on the evolution of the special language of medicine, based on the electronic corpus of Early Modern English Medical Texts, containing over two million words of medical writing from 1500 to 1700.


Summary Details


Query:   Scope Ambiguities
Author:  Eung-Cheon Hah
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Semantics
Syntax

Summary:   Dear linguists,

A couple of weeks ago, I posted a questionnaire on scope ambiguities.
Eight people, some of them with valuable comments, responded to the
questionnaire. A short summary is given below with the result in the
parenthesis of each sentence. I'd like to express my heartful thanks to
the following linguists.


Deborah Milam Berkley <dberkley@babel.ling.nwu.edu>
Barbara Lazenby Simpson <bsimpson@tcd.ie>
stephen p spackman <stephen@acm.org>
Chris Johns <csrj100@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Roland Stuckardt <stuckardt@compuserve.com>
George Huttar 709 2400 <George_Huttar@SIL.ORG>
spencer@rainbow.net.au
"H Stephen Straight (Binghamton University/SUNY)"
<sstraigh@binghamton.edu>


*************************<Questionnaire>****************************

Please mark with +A if the following sentences are ambiguous, with +mA
if they are marginally ambiguous, and with -A if they are not ambiguous
at all.

...................
I. Between "do = expect/hope/intend to visit" and "do =visit"

(1) Which student expects/hopes/intends to visit which city that you do?
(+A: 37.5%) (+mA: 37.5%) (-A: 25%)

...................
II. Between 'cardinals'/'some'/'what' and 'every'/'most'

(2) a. Some congressional aide asked to see every report.
(+A: 12.5%) (+mA: 25%) (-A: 62.5%)
b. Some congressional aide asked John to see every report.
(+A: 12.5%) (+mA: 37.5%) (-A: 50%)
c. Some congressional aide saw every report.
(+A: 37.5%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 62.5%)

(3) a. At least two American tour groups expect to visit every European
country this year.
(+A: 37.5%) (+mA: 12.5%) (-A: 50%)
b. At least two American tour groups expect to visit every European
country next year.
(+A: 37.5%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 62.5%)
c. At least two American tour groups visited every European country
last year.
(+A: 37.5%) (+mA: 12.5%) (-A: 50%)

(4) At least one tourist wants to visit every city.
(+A: 25%) (+mA: 25%) (-A: 50%)

(5) a. Some agency intends to send aid to every Bosnian city this year.
(+A: 37.5%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 62.5%)
b. Some agency intends to send aid to every Bosnian city next year.
(+A: 50%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 50%)
c. Some agency sent aid to every Bosnian city last year.
(+A: 50%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 50%)

(6) a. At least four recreational vehicles tried to stop at most AAA
approved campsites last year.
(+A: 75%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 25%)
b. At least four recreational vehicles stopped at most AAA approved
campsites last year.
(+A: 37.5%) (+mA: 12.5%) (-A: 50%)

(7) At least two American tour groups are expected to visit every
European country this year.
(+A: 62.5%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 37.5%)

(8) Some agency is expected to send aide to every Bosnian city this
year.
(+A: 25%) (+mA: 37.5%) (-A: 37.5%)

(9) At least four recreational vehicles are expected to stop at most
AAA
approved campsites this year.
(+A: 50%) (+mA: 25%) (-A: 25%)

(10) Some congressional aide is expected to see every report.
(+A: 25%) (+mA: 12.5%) (-A: 62.5%)

(11) a. Someone expects to dance with every woman.
(+A: 50%) (+mA: 12.5%) (-A: 37.5%)
b. Someone wants to dance with every woman.
(+A: 62.5%) (+mA: 12.5%) (-A: 25%)

(12) a. Someone promised her to invite everyone.
(+A: 25%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 62.5%)
b. Someone persuaded her to invite everyone.
(+A: 25%) (+mA: 12.5%) (-A: 50%)
c. Someone persuaded her that she should invite everyone.
(+A: 12.5%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 75%)
d. John promised someone to invite everyone.
(+A: 25%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 75%)
e. John persuaded someone to invite everyone.
(+A: 37.5%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 62.5%)
=====>One person was mute on (12a,b,c)

(13) a. What did everyone make a plan to say?
(+A: 25%) (+mA: 12.5%) (-A: 62.5%)
b. What did everyone plan to say?
(+A: 25%) (+mA: 25%) (-A: 50%)

(14) a. What did you make the claim that everyone said?
(+A: 25%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 37.5%)
====>Three people judged (14a) to be ungrammatical or unacceptable.
b. What did you claim that everyone said?
(+A: 12.5%) (+mA: 12.5%) (-A: 75%)

...................
III. Between 'who' and 'everyone'

(15) a. Who does everyone think you saw?
(+A: 12.5%) (+mA: 12.5%) (-A: 75%)
b. Who does everyone think saw you?
(+A: 25%) (+mA: 0%) (-A: 75%)

******************************************************************************

Best wishes,
Eung-Cheon Hah

LL Issue: 8.539
Date Posted: 18-Apr-1997
Original Query: Read original query


Back

Sums main page