Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Holy Sh*t: A Brief History of Swearing

By Melissa Mohr

Holy Sh*t: A Brief History of Swearing "contains original research into the history of swearing, and is scrupulous in analyzing the claims of other scholars."


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

A New Manual of French Composition

By R. L. Graeme Ritchie

A New Manual of French Composition "provides a guide to French composition aimed at university students and the higher classes in schools. "


The LINGUIST List is dedicated to providing information on language and language analysis, and to providing the discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in the digital world. LINGUIST is a free resource, run by linguistics students and faculty, and supported primarily by your donations. Please support LINGUIST List during the 2016 Fund Drive.

Summary Details


Query:   Inversion in embedded clauses
Author:  mwl1 mwl1
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Discourse Analysis
Sociolinguistics
Text/Corpus Linguistics

Summary:   - ---

I ASKED WHETHER NATIVE SPEAKERS OF ENGLISH ACCEPT (2B) AND (3B) AS
STYLISTICALLY MARKED VARIANTS OF (2A) AND (3A), OR WHETHER (2B) AND (3B)
ARE PLAINLY UNGRAMMATICAL?

(2A) I WONDER INTO WHICH GARDEN MY MOTHER WENT.
(2B) I WONDER INTO WHICH GARDEN WENT MY MOTHER.
(3A) THAT IS THE GARDEN INTO WHICH MY MOTHER WENT.
(3B) THAT IS THE GARDEN INTO WHICH WENT MY MOTHER.

I RECEIVED 15 REPLIES. A FEW RESPONDENTS CAUTIONED THAT (IN AMERICAN
ENGLISH) EVEN (2A) AND (2B) ARE STYLISTICALLY MARKED BECAUSE OF THE USE
OF PIED PIPING. SOME OTHER RESPONNDENTS MENTIONED A CONTRAST BETWEEN (2B)
AND (3B), SO I THINK I HAD BETTER LIST WHAT EACH RESPONDENT/INFORMANT
SAID ABOUT EACH SENTENCE IN THIS SUMMARY. (16 INFORMANTS' JUDGMENTS ARE
LISTED HERE BECAUSE TWO REPLIES CONTAIN DATA FROM MORE THAN ONE INFORMANT
AND ONE CONTAINS NO JUDGMENT DATA.)

FOR (2B):
(1) 'SOUND FINE ... SEEM A LITTLE LESS STYLISTICALLY MARKED THAN THE
NON-EXTRACTED CASE ... SOUND EVEN BETTER IF THE INVERTED SUBJECT IS HEAVY'
(2) 'UNGRAMMATICAL, OR AT LEAST VERY ODD'
(3) 'PLAINLY UNGRAMMATICAL'
(4) 'UNGRAMMATICAL ... ONE STEP BEYOND

LL Issue: 11.165
Date Posted: 26-Jan-2000
Original Query: Read original query