Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Wiley-Blackwell Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info

New from Oxford University Press!


Language Planning as a Sociolinguistic Experiment

By: Ernst Jahr

Provides richly detailed insight into the uniqueness of the Norwegian language development. Marks the 200th anniversary of the birth of the Norwegian nation following centuries of Danish rule

New from Cambridge University Press!


Acquiring Phonology: A Cross-Generational Case-Study

By Neil Smith

The study also highlights the constructs of current linguistic theory, arguing for distinctive features and the notion 'onset' and against some of the claims of Optimality Theory and Usage-based accounts.

New from Brill!


Language Production and Interpretation: Linguistics meets Cognition

By Henk Zeevat

The importance of Henk Zeevat's new monograph cannot be overstated. [...] I recommend it to anyone who combines interests in language, logic, and computation [...]. David Beaver, University of Texas at Austin

Summary Details

Query:   Chomsky & Statistics
Author:  Joseph Davis
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Linguistic Theories

Summary:   For Query: Linguist 11.375


Recently I posted a query concerning a reference I
vaguely misremembered from Chomsky on the irrelevance
of quantitative data in formal linguistics. Thanks to
the following for responding: Sabine Bartsch, Stefan
Thomas Gries, Mike Dowman, Barbara J. Luka, Leonor
Santos, Joel Walters, V.J. Cook, Paul Chapin, Toby
Ayer, and Vern M. Lindbad.

Two citations in Syntactic Structures were mentioned:
p. 17, and Ch. 2 para. 2.4. The citation I was
actually seeking was found by Sabine Bartsch; it is:
Halliday, M.A.K. 1991. "Corups Studies and
Probabilistic Grammar" in Karin Aijmer and Bengt
Altenberg (eds). _Corups Linguistics: Studies in
Honour of Jan Svartvik._ London, New York: Longman.
30-43. It has to do with the sentences "I live in New
York" and "I live in Dayton Ohio." The point was that
frequency of use has nothing to do with grammaticality

My own paper concerns the use of quantitative data not
in formal linguistics, but in what has been called a
"radically functional" "sign-based" approach, Columbia
School. My thesis is that the use of quantitative
validation of semantic hypotheses is legitimate but
that typically the use of statistical inference is not
(and is not necessary).

Recent Columbia School books are:

Contini-Morava, Ellen, and Barbara Sussman Goldberg
(eds). 1995. _Meaning as Explanation: Advances in
Linguistic Sign Theory_. Mouton de Gruyter.

Huffman, Alan. 1997. _The Categories of Grammar:
French lui and le._ John Benjamins.

Reid, Wallis. 1991. _Verb and Noun Number in
English: A Functional Explanation._ Longman.

My paper is expected to appear in a volume being
edited by Ricardo and Otheguy and Wallis Reid and to
be published by Benjamins.

Thanks to all who helped.

Joseph Davis
City College of New York

LL Issue: 11.567
Date Posted: 14-Mar-2000
Original Query: Read original query


Sums main page