Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info

New from Oxford University Press!


Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology

Edited by Jacques Durand, Ulrike Gut, and Gjert Kristoffersen

Offers the first detailed examination of corpus phonology and serves as a practical guide for researchers interested in compiling or using phonological corpora

New from Cambridge University Press!


The Languages of the Jews: A Sociolinguistic History

By Bernard Spolsky

A vivid commentary on Jewish survival and Jewish speech communities that will be enjoyed by the general reader, and is essential reading for students and researchers interested in the study of Middle Eastern languages, Jewish studies, and sociolinguistics.

New from Brill!


Indo-European Linguistics

New Open Access journal on Indo-European Linguistics is now available!

Summary Details

Query:   Report on Test for a Universal (`but', `also')
Author:  Arthur Merin
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Typology

Summary:   This is to report on the result of a call for testing a candidate
universal hypothesis concerning bona fide translation equivalents of
the English clausal conjunction 'but' and of the focus particle
'also'. (Volume 8.501 of Linguist List, 11 April 1997.)

At the editors' suggestion, here is, first, the hypothesis again for
convenience of reference:

> Any language having bona fide translation equivalents
> of the coordinating conjunction `but' will have
> equivalents of
> (1) `Kim walks but {Kim/(s)he[K]} talks' (Pa but Qa)
> acceptable in suitable contexts (here, e.g.: we are
> looking for a very silent messenger), whereas
> equivalents of
> (2) *`Kim walks but Sandy walks' (Pa but Pb)
> will never be acceptable (assuming default prosody
> or a suitable equivalent - see below), while in any
> language having, in addition, a bona fide translation
> equivalent of `also' or `too', equivalents of
> (3) `Kim walks but Sandy {also walks/walks too}'
> will always be acceptable again.
> Explanatory Note: "Default prosody" for English means at the
> very least: absence (or nonobligatoriness) of a marked pause
> preceding `but'. I.e. the unacceptability judgment for
> (2) is claimed to be stable for that single-speaker reading
> (both with regard to prosody and interpretation) which is NOT
> paraphraseable as
> (4) `Kim walks, but then Sandy walks'
> where `then' is NON-TEMPORAL, as evidenced by preservation of
> its intended interpretation in
> (5) `Kim has walked, but then Sandy has walked'.
> (The intended and, for atemporal `then', presumably obligatory
> reading for the English ex. (4) is one where the second clause
> introduces an explanation for the eventuality designated by the
> first.)

No counterexamples to the hypothesis have been reported.

Arthur Merin
Institute for Language and Computation (IMS)
University of Stuttgart
Azenbergstr. 12
70174 Stuttgart

Arthur Merin
- ----- End of forwarded message -------

LL Issue: 9.240
Date Posted: 18-Feb-1998
Original Query: Read original query


Sums main page