Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology

Edited by Jacques Durand, Ulrike Gut, and Gjert Kristoffersen

Offers the first detailed examination of corpus phonology and serves as a practical guide for researchers interested in compiling or using phonological corpora


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

The Languages of the Jews: A Sociolinguistic History

By Bernard Spolsky

A vivid commentary on Jewish survival and Jewish speech communities that will be enjoyed by the general reader, and is essential reading for students and researchers interested in the study of Middle Eastern languages, Jewish studies, and sociolinguistics.


New from Brill!

ad

Indo-European Linguistics

New Open Access journal on Indo-European Linguistics is now available!


Summary Details


Query:   Sum: spoken vs. written language
Author:  Nicole Dehe
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Lexicography

Summary:   I would like to thank all who have responded to my request for
information about (empirical or theoretical) studies on spoken
vs. written language, constituent order alternation in particular,
posted on the LinguistList a while ago (Linguist 14.1906). Here is a
summary.

A lot of corpus work investigating the difference between spoken and
written language has been done by Douglas Biber and colleagues. Here
are some publications:

BIBER, Douglas. (1986). ''Spoken and written textual dimensions in
English.'' In: Language 62(2): 384-414.

BIBER, Douglas. (1988). Variation across Speech and
Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

BIBER, Douglas et al (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating
language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

BIBER, Douglas et al (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written
English.

BIBER, Douglas et al (2002). ''Speaking and Writing in the University:
A Multidimensional Comparison''. In: TESOL 36: 9-48.

Jim Miller (and colleagues) have also done a lot of work on the
topic. Here are two references:

MILLER, Jim & Regina Weinert. 1998. Spontaneous Spoken Language:
Syntax and Discourse. Oxford: Clarendon. (REVIEWED by J.L. Mackenzie,
in Journal of Linguistics 37 (2001): 225-229.)

MILLER, Jim. 2001. ''Spoken and written language''. In: Pragmatic
Organisation of Discourse in the languages of Europe, Vol. 1;
ed. G. Bernini; Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Other obvious studies are:

HALLIDAY, M.A.K. 1985. Spoken and Written Language.

AKINNASO, F. 1982. ''On the difference between spoken and written
language''. In Language and Speech 25: 97-125.

TANNEN, D. (ed.) 1984. Coherence in Spoken and Written
Discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

There is also work on specific constructions, e.g.:
On ellipsis:

GREENBAUM, S. & G. NELSON, 1999. Elliptical clauses in spoken and
written English. In P. Collins and D.Lee (eds) The Clause in English:
in honour of Rodney Huddleston. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Reviewed
by B.Aarts, in Journal of Linguistics 37/2 (2001), 423-428.

On coordination and subordination: BEAMAN, K. 1984. ''Coordination and
subordination revisited: Syntactic complexity in spoken and written
narrative discourse.'' In: D. Tannen (ed.), Coherence in Spoken and
Written Discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 44-80.

There is a grammar (in prep.) by R. CARTER & M. CARTHY (A Spoken and
Written Grammar of English for Advanced Level; Cambridge University
Press).

Don't hesitate to email me for a complete list of the work that was
suggested to me.

Thanks again, Nicole

www.tu-bs.de/~ndehe

LL Issue: 14.1986
Date Posted: 22-Jul-2003
Original Query: Read original query


Back

Sums main page