Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Linguistic Diversity and Social Justice

By Ingrid Piller

Linguistic Diversity and Social Justice "prompts thinking about linguistic disadvantage as a form of structural disadvantage that needs to be recognized and taken seriously."


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Language Evolution: The Windows Approach

By Rudolf Botha

Language Evolution: The Windows Approach addresses the question: "How can we unravel the evolution of language, given that there is no direct evidence about it?"


The LINGUIST List is dedicated to providing information on language and language analysis, and to providing the discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in the digital world. LINGUIST is a free resource, run by linguistics students and faculty, and supported primarily by your donations. Please support LINGUIST List during the 2016 Fund Drive.

Summary Details


Query:   Sum: spoken vs. written language
Author:  Nicole Dehe
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Lexicography

Summary:   I WOULD LIKE TO THANK ALL WHO HAVE RESPONDED TO MY REQUEST FOR
INFORMATION ABOUT (EMPIRICAL OR THEORETICAL) STUDIES ON SPOKEN
VS. WRITTEN LANGUAGE, CONSTITUENT ORDER ALTERNATION IN PARTICULAR,
POSTED ON THE LINGUISTLIST A WHILE AGO (LINGUIST 14.1906). HERE IS A
SUMMARY.

A LOT OF CORPUS WORK INVESTIGATING THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SPOKEN AND
WRITTEN LANGUAGE HAS BEEN DONE BY DOUGLAS BIBER AND COLLEAGUES. HERE
ARE SOME PUBLICATIONS:

BIBER, DOUGLAS. (1986). ''SPOKEN AND WRITTEN TEXTUAL DIMENSIONS IN
ENGLISH.'' IN: LANGUAGE 62(2): 384-414.

BIBER, DOUGLAS. (1988). VARIATION ACROSS SPEECH AND
WRITING. CAMBRIDGE: CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS.

BIBER, DOUGLAS ET AL (1998). CORPUS LINGUISTICS: INVESTIGATING
LANGUAGE STRUCTURE AND USE. CAMBRIDGE: CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS.

BIBER, DOUGLAS ET AL (1999). LONGMAN GRAMMAR OF SPOKEN AND WRITTEN
ENGLISH.

BIBER, DOUGLAS ET AL (2002). ''SPEAKING AND WRITING IN THE UNIVERSITY:
A MULTIDIMENSIONAL COMPARISON''. IN: TESOL 36: 9-48.

JIM MILLER (AND COLLEAGUES) HAVE ALSO DONE A LOT OF WORK ON THE
TOPIC. HERE ARE TWO REFERENCES:

MILLER, JIM & REGINA WEINERT. 1998. SPONTANEOUS SPOKEN LANGUAGE:
SYNTAX AND DISCOURSE. OXFORD: CLARENDON. (REVIEWED BY J.L. MACKENZIE,
IN JOURNAL OF LINGUISTICS 37 (2001): 225-229.)

MILLER, JIM. 2001. ''SPOKEN AND WRITTTEN LANGUAGE''. IN: PRAGMATIC
ORGANISATION OF DISCOURSE IN THE LANGUAGES OF EUROPE, VOL. 1;
ED. G. BERNINI; BERLIN: MOUTON DE GRUYTER.

OTHER OBVIOUS STUDIES ARE:

HALLIDAY, M.A.K. 1985. SPOKEN AND WRITTEN LANGUAGE.

AKINNASO, F. 1982. ''ON THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SPOKEN AND WRITTEN
LANGUAGE''. IN LANGUAGE AND SPEECH 25: 97-125.

TANNEN, D. (ED.) 1984. COHERENCE IN SPOKEN AND WRITTEN
DISCOURSE. NORWOOD, NJ: ABLEX.

THERE IS ALSO WORK ON SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTIONS, E.G.:
ON ELLIPSIS:

GREENBAUM, S. & G. NELSON, 1999. ELLIPTICAL CLAUSES IN SPOKEN AND
WRITTEN ENGLISH. IN P. COLLINS AND D.LEE (EDS) THE CLAUSE IN ENGLISH:
IN HONOUR OF RODNEY HUDDLESTON. AMSTERDAM: JOHN BENJAMINS. REVIEWED
BY B.AARTS, IN JOURNAL OF LINGUISTICS 37/2 (2001), 423-428.

ON COORDINATION AND SUBORDINATION: BEAMAN, K. 1984. ''COORDINATION AND
SUBORDINATION REVISITED: SYNTACTIC COMPLEXITY IN SPOKEN AND WRITTEN
NARRATIVE DISCOURSE.'' IN: D. TANNEN (ED.), COHERENCE IN SPOKEN AND
WRITTEN DISCOURSE. NORWOOD, NJ: ABLEX, 44-80.

THERE IS A GRAMMAR (IN PREP.) BY R. CARTER & M. CARTHY (A SPOKEN AND
WRITTEN GRAMMAR OF ENGLISH FOR ADVANCED LEVEL; CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY
PRESS).

DON'T HESITATE TO EMAIL ME FOR A COMPLETE LIST OF THE WORK THAT WAS
SUGGESTED TO ME.

THANKS AGAIN, NICOLE

WWW.TU-BS.DE/~NDEHE

LL Issue: 14.1986
Date Posted: 22-Jul-2003
Original Query: Read original query