Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Wiley-Blackwell Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info

New from Oxford University Press!


Language Planning as a Sociolinguistic Experiment

By: Ernst Jahr

Provides richly detailed insight into the uniqueness of the Norwegian language development. Marks the 200th anniversary of the birth of the Norwegian nation following centuries of Danish rule

New from Cambridge University Press!


Acquiring Phonology: A Cross-Generational Case-Study

By Neil Smith

The study also highlights the constructs of current linguistic theory, arguing for distinctive features and the notion 'onset' and against some of the claims of Optimality Theory and Usage-based accounts.

New from Brill!


Language Production and Interpretation: Linguistics meets Cognition

By Henk Zeevat

The importance of Henk Zeevat's new monograph cannot be overstated. [...] I recommend it to anyone who combines interests in language, logic, and computation [...]. David Beaver, University of Texas at Austin

Summary Details

Query:   Passives with object agreement
Author:  Mark Donohue
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Syntax

Language Family:   Niger-Congo

Summary:   A few weeks ago, which in my personal chronology is one major logic
board failure in my computer ago, I posted a query about the
occurrence of complex predicates in which the one verb form appears
with both passive morphology and object-agreement marking, for two
different arguments (either a base ditransitive, or a derived verb). I
cited some examples from Pancana, an Austronesian language from
Southeast Sulawesi, which *almost* shows this pattern, and asked if
anyone knew of any more languages that did this, less ambiguously
(Linguist 14.1833).

It is indeed possible for a language to permit object marking when the
clause is passive, as long as were talking about a different
object. Examples come from KiChaga, Haya and Runyambo.

Swahili also allows the object marking + passive on the one verb, but
under strict restrictions. The logic board crash unfortunately
destroyed the example I was so kindly sent, but it does happen.

KiChaga (tone marks omitted) (Bresnan and Moshi 1990)
M-ka n-a-i-ki-lyi-o
1-wife FOC-1S-PR-7O-eat-APPL-PASS
The wife is being [benefitted/adversely affected] by someones eating

Runyambo (Rugemalira 1993: 229)

omw?n? a-ka-bi-reet-er-w-? omus?ija
child she-PAST-them-bring-APPL-PASS-FV man
the child was brought them by a man

The following Haya example is a base-ditransitive verb, applicativised
(which makes for four core arguments), and then passivised; that
leaves room for two object prefixes:

omwaan a-ka-ga-ba-siig-il-w-a Kato
child he-P3-it-them-smear-APPL-PASS-Kato
the child was smeared oil for them by Kato.

All interesting, and all Bantu. Id be curious to see if this happens
anywhere else: so far weve got multiple Bantu attestations, and some
near-misses in Austronesian. Any other takers?

Thanks to Alex Alsina and the now anonymous Swahili-information giver
for references and examples.


Bresnan, Joan, and Lioba Moshi. 1990. Object asymmetries in
comparative Bantu syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 147-185.

Duranti, Alessandro and Ernest Rugwa Byarushengo. 1977. On the notion
of ''direct object''. In E.R. Byarushengo, A Duranti, and L.M. Hyman,
eds., Haya grammatical structure (Southern California Occasional
Papers in Linguistics No. 6): 45-71.

Rugemalira, Josephat M. 1993. Bantu multiple object
constructions. Linguistic Analysis 23 (3-4): 226-252.

-Mark Donohue

Language-Family: Niger-Congo; Code: NC

LL Issue: 8.675
Date Posted: 07-May-1997
Original Query: Read original query


Sums main page