Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

How Traditions Live and Die

By Olivier Morin

This book brings together cognitive science and quantitative cultural history to look into the causes of cultural survival.


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

The Acquisition of Heritage Languages

By Silvina Montrul

"This work centres on the grammatical development of the heritage language and the language learning trajectory of heritage speakers, synthesizing recent experimental research."


Summary Details


Query:   Summary: multiple wh-questions
Author:  Miura Ikuo
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Syntax

Summary:   DEAR LINGUISTS,

IN SEPTEMBER, I POSTED TWO QUESTIONS ABOUT MULTIPLE WH-QUESTIONS IN
ENGLISH. I'D LIKE TO THANK EVERYONE WHO REPLIED TO ME, AND APOLOGIZE FOR
TAKING SO LONG TIME TO POST THE SUMMARY.
MY QUESTIONS WERE THE FOLLOWING.

*********
1. IN THE LITERATURE, IT IS OBSERVED THAT WHILE THE SENTENCE IN (1A) IS
GRAMMATICAL, THE CORRESPONDING (1B) IS NOT. IT IS KNOWN THAT EVEN IF (1B)
IS GRAMMATICAL, IT IS ONLY AS AN ECHO-QUESTION.

(1) A. WHO SAID WHAT?
B. WHAT DID WHO SAY?

I WANT TO KNOW WHETHER THE FOLLOWING PAIRS OF SENTENCES EXHIBIT THE SAME
CONTRAST AS IN (1).

(2) A. WHOSE MOTHER BOUGHT WHAT?
B. WHAT DID WHOSE MOTHER BUY?
(3) A. PEOPLE FROM WHERE BOUGHT WHAT?
B. WHAT DID PEOPLE FROM WHERE BUY?
(4) A. TELL ME WHOSE ADVISOR IS WHERE.
B. TELL ME WHERE WHOSE ADVISOR IS?

THE SENTENCES IN (2B) AND (3B) ARE FROM STROIK (1995). HE SAYS THAT THEY
ARE GRAMMATICAL EVEN IF THE OBJECT WH-PHRASES HAVE MOVED ACROSS THE OTHER
WH-PHRASES IN THE SAME WAY AS (1B). BUT HE DOESN'T MENTION ABOUT THE
GRAMMMATICALITY OF (2B) AND (3B).

2. IN THE LITERATURE, PSYCH-VERBS LIKE 'WORRY' AND 'ANNOY' WHICH TAKE THE
EXPERIENCER ARGUMENT AS THE OBJECT BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY FROM VERBS LIKE 'SAY'
WITH RESPECT TO SOME PHENOMENA LIKE ANAPHOR BINDING. SO I WANT TO KNOW
WHETHER OR NOT MULTIPLE WH-QUESTIONS OF PSYCH-VERBS LIKE (5) AND (6)
EXHIBIT THE SAME CONTRAST AS (1).

(5) A. WHAT WORRIES WHO?
B. WHO DOES WHAT WORRY?
(6) A. WHAT ANNOIES WHO?
B. WHO DOES WHAT ANNOY?
*********

THE FOLLOWING ARE THOSE WHO ANSWERED THESE QUESTIONS:

DAN FAULKNER
JIM WITTE
BERNARD KRIPKEE
VINCENT JENKINS
AND ROSTA

AS FOR QUESTION 1, ALL OF THEM AGREE THAT (2B) AND (3B) HAVE THE SAME
STATUS AS (1B). THAT IS, THEY ARE UNGRAMMATICAL, OR GRAMMATICAL IN SPECIAL
CONTEXTS. THESE JUDGMENTS ARE SURPRISING, BECAUSE STROIK TAKES (2B) AND
(3B) TO HAVE THE SAME STATUS AS (1A) NOT (1B), I.E., HE SEEMS TO JUDGE (2B)
AND (3B) AS GRAMMATICAL IN ISOLATION.
THE CONTEXTS WHICH MAKE (1B), (2B), AND (3B) ACCEPTABLE ARE ECHO-QUESTION
CONTEXTS OR

LL Issue: 10.173
Date Posted: 04-Feb-1999
Original Query: Read original query